11.3.1 Set‐based design – the lean tool that eludes us; Pitfalls in implementing set‐based design in Kongsberg Automotive
Elisabeth Hansen, Gerrit Müller
Abstract
Elisabeth Hansen, Gerrit Müller
Abstract
Abstract This paper is based on a five month research project performed at the company Kongsberg Automotive (KA). It describes a study of the implementation of set‐based design in project processes in KA, results from the study, and evaluations of these results. The focus has been on knowledge gaps in relation to the implementation of set‐based design. Data has been gathered through observations, discussions with and feedback from employees, interviews and surveys, as well as literature research in order to evaluate the implementation of set‐based design. A set‐based approach has also been used in this research through the development of a set of theories that were investigated in an effort to disprove them or create a basis to support the probability of the theory being correct. Through this project it has become clear that there are variations in the employees' knowledge on what set‐based design entails. Data show that there is far more agreement on potential goals and benefits of the implementation. This indicates that the employees know where they are going, but that there is some ambiguity as to how to get there. This could be resolved through clarification of the elements of the process and clarification of how the company wants to achieve its goals.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This paper is based on a five month research project performed at the company Kongsberg Automotive (KA). It describes a study of the implementation of set‐based design in project processes in KA, results from the study, and evaluations of these results. The focus has been on knowledge gaps in relation to the implementation of set‐based design. Data has been gathered through observations, discussions with and feedback from employees, interviews and surveys, as well as literature research in order to evaluate the implementation of set‐based design. A set‐based approach has also been used in this research through the development of a set of theories that were investigated in an effort to disprove them or create a basis to support the probability of the theory being correct. Through this project it has become clear that there are variations in the employees' knowledge on what set‐based design entails. Data show that there is far more agreement on potential goals and benefits of the implementation. This indicates that the employees know where they are going, but that there is some ambiguity as to how to get there. This could be resolved through clarification of the elements of the process and clarification of how the company wants to achieve its goals.
Key concepts: Set (abstract data type), Ambiguity, Automotive industry, Process (computing), Relation (database), Computer science, Order (exchange), Knowledge management