2005Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand SurgeryRequires access

Effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the survival of skin flaps in rats

Zekeriya Tosun, Sema Tuncer, Alper Yosunkaya, Adem Özkan, Sadık Şentürk, Nedim Savacı

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The effects of inhalational anaesthetic agents on survival of flaps are not well known. We investigated the effect of isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia on survival of flaps using a caudally-based McFarlane skin flap in 20 male Wistar rats. Sevoflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and isoflurane (1 MAC) in oxygen mixture was given to the animals. A 4 x10 cm caudally-based standard McFarlane flap was raised. There were no differences in any haemodynamic values or blood gases between the sevoflurane group and the isoflurane group. Skin flaps were assessed on the seventh day. The isoflurane group had a significantly smaller area of skin flap necrosis and an increased area of flap surviving than the sevoflurane group. We conclude that survival is significantly improved when isoflurane is used as the inhalational anaesthetic rather than sevoflurane.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of inhalational anaesthetic agents on survival of flaps are not well known. We investigated the effect of isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia on survival of flaps using a caudally-based McFarlane skin flap in 20 male Wistar rats. Sevoflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and isoflurane (1 MAC) in oxygen mixture was given to the animals. A 4 x10 cm caudally-based standard McFarlane flap was raised. There were no differences in any haemodynamic values or blood gases between the sevoflurane group and the isoflurane group. Skin flaps were assessed on the seventh day. The isoflurane group had a significantly smaller area of skin flap necrosis and an increased area of flap surviving than the sevoflurane group. We conclude that survival is significantly improved when isoflurane is used as the inhalational anaesthetic rather than sevoflurane.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of inhalational anaesthetic agents on survival of flaps are not well known. We investigated the effect of isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia on survival of flaps using a caudally-based McFarlane skin flap in 20 male Wistar rats. Sevoflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and isoflurane (1 MAC) in oxygen mixture was given to the animals. A 4 x10 cm caudally-based standard McFarlane flap was raised. There were no differences in any haemodynamic values or blood gases between the sevoflurane group and the isoflurane group. Skin flaps were assessed on the seventh day. The isoflurane group had a significantly smaller area of skin flap necrosis and an increased area of flap surviving than the sevoflurane group. We conclude that survival is significantly improved when isoflurane is used as the inhalational anaesthetic rather than sevoflurane.

Key concepts: Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, Medicine, Minimum alveolar concentration, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the survival of skin flaps in rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens