1973Journal of MicroscopyRequires access

Contrast and resolution from biological objects examined in the electron microscope with particular reference to negatively stained specimens

Robert W. Horne

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY For the practical biologist applying electron microscopy to the study of biological macromolecules, there are serious problems in obtaining high resolution images showing detail below 2.5–3.0 nm. The limitation in resolution from biological specimens can be attributed to support film thickness and granularity, specimen preparation, irradiation damage, focusing effects and possible contamination in the electron beam. Specimens possessing repeating features can be analysed and averaged by optical diffraction and image reconstruction methods which offer some improvement to the signal to noise ratio. The above problems, with particular reference to irradiation damage, still impose the basic limitation for high resolution applications. When considered together they offer formidable difficulties in practical terms in attempting to make full use of the potential resolving power of modern electron microscopes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY For the practical biologist applying electron microscopy to the study of biological macromolecules, there are serious problems in obtaining high resolution images showing detail below 2.5–3.0 nm. The limitation in resolution from biological specimens can be attributed to support film thickness and granularity, specimen preparation, irradiation damage, focusing effects and possible contamination in the electron beam. Specimens possessing repeating features can be analysed and averaged by optical diffraction and image reconstruction methods which offer some improvement to the signal to noise ratio. The above problems, with particular reference to irradiation damage, still impose the basic limitation for high resolution applications. When considered together they offer formidable difficulties in practical terms in attempting to make full use of the potential resolving power of modern electron microscopes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY For the practical biologist applying electron microscopy to the study of biological macromolecules, there are serious problems in obtaining high resolution images showing detail below 2.5–3.0 nm. The limitation in resolution from biological specimens can be attributed to support film thickness and granularity, specimen preparation, irradiation damage, focusing effects and possible contamination in the electron beam. Specimens possessing repeating features can be analysed and averaged by optical diffraction and image reconstruction methods which offer some improvement to the signal to noise ratio. The above problems, with particular reference to irradiation damage, still impose the basic limitation for high resolution applications. When considered together they offer formidable difficulties in practical terms in attempting to make full use of the potential resolving power of modern electron microscopes.

Key concepts: Resolution (logic), Biological specimen, Granularity, Electron microscope, Optics, Microscope, Microscopy, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contrast and resolution from biological objects examined in the electron microscope with particular reference to negatively stained specimens — Research Paper | ScholarLens