1986Tree PhysiologyRequires access

Physiographic, stand, and environmental effects on individual tree growth and growth efficiency in subalpine forests

M. R. Kaufmann, Michael G. Ryan

Open publisher page 83 citations

Abstract

Annual volume growth of subalpine trees in the central Rocky Mountains was studied in relation to site and stand conditions. Growth of individual trees was most strongly influenced by estimated potential absorbed radiation, which varied with physiographic conditions and tree leaf area. Growth efficiency was estimated by the ratio of annual volume growth to potential radiation absorption by the crown. Growth efficiency was higher in young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) than in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) or subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). In all species, growth efficiency declined sharply with age, and suppressed and overtopped trees had growth efficiencies equal to the highest efficiencies observed for dominant/codominant or intermediate trees. Lodgepole pine growth was most responsive to site and stand variables, Engelmann spruce was intermediate, and subalpine fir was rather unresponsive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Annual volume growth of subalpine trees in the central Rocky Mountains was studied in relation to site and stand conditions. Growth of individual trees was most strongly influenced by estimated potential absorbed radiation, which varied with physiographic conditions and tree leaf area. Growth efficiency was estimated by the ratio of annual volume growth to potential radiation absorption by the crown. Growth efficiency was higher in young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) than in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) or subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). In all species, growth efficiency declined sharply with age, and suppressed and overtopped trees had growth efficiencies equal to the highest efficiencies observed for dominant/codominant or intermediate trees. Lodgepole pine growth was most responsive to site and stand variables, Engelmann spruce was intermediate, and subalpine fir was rather unresponsive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 83 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Annual volume growth of subalpine trees in the central Rocky Mountains was studied in relation to site and stand conditions. Growth of individual trees was most strongly influenced by estimated potential absorbed radiation, which varied with physiographic conditions and tree leaf area. Growth efficiency was estimated by the ratio of annual volume growth to potential radiation absorption by the crown. Growth efficiency was higher in young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) than in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) or subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). In all species, growth efficiency declined sharply with age, and suppressed and overtopped trees had growth efficiencies equal to the highest efficiencies observed for dominant/codominant or intermediate trees. Lodgepole pine growth was most responsive to site and stand variables, Engelmann spruce was intermediate, and subalpine fir was rather unresponsive.

Key concepts: Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Abies lasiocarpa, Subalpine forest, Montane ecology, Crown (dentistry), Site index, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Physiographic, stand, and environmental effects on individual tree growth and growth efficiency in subalpine forests — Research Paper | ScholarLens