2011The Journal of UrologyRequires access

2136 EFFICACY OF DUTASTERIDE IN MEN WITH LOW PROSTATE VOLUME IN THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) STUDY

Curtis A. Pettaway, J. Curtis Nickel, Michael Marberger, Timothy H. Wilson, Roger S. Rittmaster

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening1 Apr 20112136 EFFICACY OF DUTASTERIDE IN MEN WITH LOW PROSTATE VOLUME IN THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) STUDY Curtis A. Pettaway, J. Curtis Nickel, Michael Marberger, Timothy H. Wilson, and Roger S. Rittmaster Curtis A. PettawayCurtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author , J. Curtis NickelJ. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author , Michael MarbergerMichael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author , Timothy H. WilsonTimothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author , and Roger S. RittmasterRoger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2333AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In the REDUCE study, dutasteride (DUT) compared with placebo (PBO) reduced the risk of incident prostate cancer by 23% and improved outcomes related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with increased risk of PCa. Because previous DUT studies only enrolled men with enlarged prostates, and because prostate cancer has been reported to be more prevalent in men with small prostates, we now report the effect of DUT on PCa and BPH endpoints in men with low baseline prostate volume (PV) in REDUCE. METHODS The REDUCE study was an international, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Men received DUT (0.5 mg daily) or PBO for 4 yrs. Eligible subjects included men 50–75 yrs, with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level 2.5–10 ng/ml and a single negative prostate biopsy (6–12 cores) within 6 months of enrollment. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and serum PSA levels were measured every 6 months. PV was measured by ultrasonography at randomization and at 2 and 4 yrs. Biopsies (10 cores) were performed at 2 and 4 yrs or when clinically indicated. Two-sided P values of ≤0.01 indicated statistical significance in the assessment of the superiority of DUT over PBO. In the present analysis we investigate outcomes related to PCa and BPH in the subgroup of men with a baseline PV <30 cc. RESULTS Within the REDUCE population, 774 men from the DUT group and 807 men from the PBO group had a PV <30 cc. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (Table). 225 cases of PCa were detected in the PBO group and 165 cases in the DUT group (p=0.0035), representing an incidence of 27.9% vs. 21.3%, respectively. Fewer men in the DUT group had BPH-related surgery (p=0.0014) and acute urinary retention (AUR) (p=0.00540) than in the PBO group. IPSS scores were lower than baseline at Month 48 in the DUT group, but higher than baseline in the PBO group (p<0.0001). The change in PV from baseline to Month 48 was significantly different between treatment groups (p<0.0001), however, the minimal decrease in the DUT group and large increase in the PBO group may imply a regression of the mean from baseline to follow-up PV measurements. Table. Baseline characteristics and PCa and BPH results in men with low prostate volume Dutasteride (n=774) Placebo (n= 807) BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS Mean age (yr) 61.5 61.6 Mean total PSA (ng/ml) 5.45 5.60 Mean IPSS 7.6 7.6 Mean PV (cc) 23.6 23.5 — — — PROSTATE CANCER RESULTS Incidence (%) 165(21.3) 225(27.9) Relative risk reduction (95% CI) 24.1(8.6,36.9) — — — — BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA RESULTS BPH-related surgery %incidence (%) 5(0.6) 22(2.7) BPH-related surgery: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 76.6(38.3,91.2) — AUR: Incidence (%) 9(1.2) 26(3.2) AUR: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 64.3(23.8,83.3) — Change in IPSS at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.36(0.186) 1.21(0.181) % change in PV at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.7(1.88) 41.4(2.60) Use of alpha blocker (%) 74/774(9.6) 115/807(14.3) *Percentages based on biopsied population (placebo n=620; dutasteride n=671). CI=confidence interval; SE=standard error. CONCLUSIONS In men with low PV, DUT lowered the overall incidence of PCa, led to greater improvements in IPSS scores and improved BPH-related outcomes over the 4-yr study period. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGrubb R, Andriole G, Somerville M, Mahoney C, Manyak M and Castro R (2012) The REDUCE Follow-Up Study: Low Rate of New Prostate Cancer Diagnoses Observed During a 2-Year, Observational, Followup Study of Men Who Participated in the REDUCE TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 3, (871-877), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013. Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e855 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Curtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author J. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author Michael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author Timothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Roger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening1 Apr 20112136 EFFICACY OF DUTASTERIDE IN MEN WITH LOW PROSTATE VOLUME IN THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) STUDY Curtis A. Pettaway, J. Curtis Nickel, Michael Marberger, Timothy H. Wilson, and Roger S. Rittmaster Curtis A. PettawayCurtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author , J. Curtis NickelJ. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author , Michael MarbergerMichael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author , Timothy H. WilsonTimothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author , and Roger S. RittmasterRoger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2333AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In the REDUCE study, dutasteride (DUT) compared with placebo (PBO) reduced the risk of incident prostate cancer by 23% and improved outcomes related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with increased risk of PCa. Because previous DUT studies only enrolled men with enlarged prostates, and because prostate cancer has been reported to be more prevalent in men with small prostates, we now report the effect of DUT on PCa and BPH endpoints in men with low baseline prostate volume (PV) in REDUCE. METHODS The REDUCE study was an international, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Men received DUT (0.5 mg daily) or PBO for 4 yrs. Eligible subjects included men 50–75 yrs, with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level 2.5–10 ng/ml and a single negative prostate biopsy (6–12 cores) within 6 months of enrollment. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and serum PSA levels were measured every 6 months. PV was measured by ultrasonography at randomization and at 2 and 4 yrs. Biopsies (10 cores) were performed at 2 and 4 yrs or when clinically indicated. Two-sided P values of ≤0.01 indicated statistical significance in the assessment of the superiority of DUT over PBO. In the present analysis we investigate outcomes related to PCa and BPH in the subgroup of men with a baseline PV <30 cc. RESULTS Within the REDUCE population, 774 men from the DUT group and 807 men from the PBO group had a PV <30 cc. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (Table). 225 cases of PCa were detected in the PBO group and 165 cases in the DUT group (p=0.0035), representing an incidence of 27.9% vs. 21.3%, respectively. Fewer men in the DUT group had BPH-related surgery (p=0.0014) and acute urinary retention (AUR) (p=0.00540) than in the PBO group. IPSS scores were lower than baseline at Month 48 in the DUT group, but higher than baseline in the PBO group (p<0.0001). The change in PV from baseline to Month 48 was significantly different between treatment groups (p<0.0001), however, the minimal decrease in the DUT group and large increase in the PBO group may imply a regression of the mean from baseline to follow-up PV measurements. Table. Baseline characteristics and PCa and BPH results in men with low prostate volume Dutasteride (n=774) Placebo (n= 807) BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS Mean age (yr) 61.5 61.6 Mean total PSA (ng/ml) 5.45 5.60 Mean IPSS 7.6 7.6 Mean PV (cc) 23.6 23.5 — — — PROSTATE CANCER RESULTS Incidence (%) 165(21.3) 225(27.9) Relative risk reduction (95% CI) 24.1(8.6,36.9) — — — — BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA RESULTS BPH-related surgery %incidence (%) 5(0.6) 22(2.7) BPH-related surgery: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 76.6(38.3,91.2) — AUR: Incidence (%) 9(1.2) 26(3.2) AUR: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 64.3(23.8,83.3) — Change in IPSS at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.36(0.186) 1.21(0.181) % change in PV at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.7(1.88) 41.4(2.60) Use of alpha blocker (%) 74/774(9.6) 115/807(14.3) *Percentages based on biopsied population (placebo n=620; dutasteride n=671). CI=confidence interval; SE=standard error. CONCLUSIONS In men with low PV, DUT lowered the overall incidence of PCa, led to greater improvements in IPSS scores and improved BPH-related outcomes over the 4-yr study period. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGrubb R, Andriole G, Somerville M, Mahoney C, Manyak M and Castro R (2012) The REDUCE Follow-Up Study: Low Rate of New Prostate Cancer Diagnoses Observed During a 2-Year, Observational, Followup Study of Men Who Participated in the REDUCE TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 3, (871-877), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013. Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e855 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Curtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author J. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author Michael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author Timothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Roger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening1 Apr 20112136 EFFICACY OF DUTASTERIDE IN MEN WITH LOW PROSTATE VOLUME IN THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) STUDY Curtis A. Pettaway, J. Curtis Nickel, Michael Marberger, Timothy H. Wilson, and Roger S. Rittmaster Curtis A. PettawayCurtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author , J. Curtis NickelJ. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author , Michael MarbergerMichael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author , Timothy H. WilsonTimothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author , and Roger S. RittmasterRoger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2333AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In the REDUCE study, dutasteride (DUT) compared with placebo (PBO) reduced the risk of incident prostate cancer by 23% and improved outcomes related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with increased risk of PCa. Because previous DUT studies only enrolled men with enlarged prostates, and because prostate cancer has been reported to be more prevalent in men with small prostates, we now report the effect of DUT on PCa and BPH endpoints in men with low baseline prostate volume (PV) in REDUCE. METHODS The REDUCE study was an international, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Men received DUT (0.5 mg daily) or PBO for 4 yrs. Eligible subjects included men 50–75 yrs, with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level 2.5–10 ng/ml and a single negative prostate biopsy (6–12 cores) within 6 months of enrollment. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and serum PSA levels were measured every 6 months. PV was measured by ultrasonography at randomization and at 2 and 4 yrs. Biopsies (10 cores) were performed at 2 and 4 yrs or when clinically indicated. Two-sided P values of ≤0.01 indicated statistical significance in the assessment of the superiority of DUT over PBO. In the present analysis we investigate outcomes related to PCa and BPH in the subgroup of men with a baseline PV <30 cc. RESULTS Within the REDUCE population, 774 men from the DUT group and 807 men from the PBO group had a PV <30 cc. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (Table). 225 cases of PCa were detected in the PBO group and 165 cases in the DUT group (p=0.0035), representing an incidence of 27.9% vs. 21.3%, respectively. Fewer men in the DUT group had BPH-related surgery (p=0.0014) and acute urinary retention (AUR) (p=0.00540) than in the PBO group. IPSS scores were lower than baseline at Month 48 in the DUT group, but higher than baseline in the PBO group (p<0.0001). The change in PV from baseline to Month 48 was significantly different between treatment groups (p<0.0001), however, the minimal decrease in the DUT group and large increase in the PBO group may imply a regression of the mean from baseline to follow-up PV measurements. Table. Baseline characteristics and PCa and BPH results in men with low prostate volume Dutasteride (n=774) Placebo (n= 807) BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS Mean age (yr) 61.5 61.6 Mean total PSA (ng/ml) 5.45 5.60 Mean IPSS 7.6 7.6 Mean PV (cc) 23.6 23.5 — — — PROSTATE CANCER RESULTS Incidence (%) 165(21.3) 225(27.9) Relative risk reduction (95% CI) 24.1(8.6,36.9) — — — — BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA RESULTS BPH-related surgery %incidence (%) 5(0.6) 22(2.7) BPH-related surgery: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 76.6(38.3,91.2) — AUR: Incidence (%) 9(1.2) 26(3.2) AUR: relative risk reduction (95% CI) 64.3(23.8,83.3) — Change in IPSS at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.36(0.186) 1.21(0.181) % change in PV at Month 48: adjusted mean (SE) −0.7(1.88) 41.4(2.60) Use of alpha blocker (%) 74/774(9.6) 115/807(14.3) *Percentages based on biopsied population (placebo n=620; dutasteride n=671). CI=confidence interval; SE=standard error. CONCLUSIONS In men with low PV, DUT lowered the overall incidence of PCa, led to greater improvements in IPSS scores and improved BPH-related outcomes over the 4-yr study period. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGrubb R, Andriole G, Somerville M, Mahoney C, Manyak M and Castro R (2012) The REDUCE Follow-Up Study: Low Rate of New Prostate Cancer Diagnoses Observed During a 2-Year, Observational, Followup Study of Men Who Participated in the REDUCE TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 3, (871-877), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013. Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e855 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Curtis A. Pettaway Houston, TX More articles by this author J. Curtis Nickel Kingston, Canada More articles by this author Michael Marberger Vienna, Austria More articles by this author Timothy H. Wilson Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Roger S. Rittmaster Research Triangle Park, NC More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Key concepts: Dutasteride, Medicine, Prostate cancer, Urology, Prostate, Hyperplasia, Prostate-specific antigen, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
2136 EFFICACY OF DUTASTERIDE IN MEN WITH LOW PROSTATE VOLUME IN THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) STUDY — Research Paper | ScholarLens