1993Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchRequires access

Vegetation management practices in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand

B. Richardson

Open publisher page 111 citations

Abstract

Radiata pine (Pinusradiata D. Don) is the predominant species in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand. Removal or suppression of noncrop vegetation is often carried out to enhance crop growth and survival by reducing competition for water, light, and nutrients. Other reasons for vegetation removal include microclimate modification, providing access into stands, and fire hazard reduction. Many studies have demonstrated large increases in crop growth from removing noncrop vegetation. Vegetation management can also mean introducing noncrop species to improve site quality, to suppress unwanted species, or to provide fodder for grazing. While herbicides are still the most widely used weed control tool, nonchemical methods are of increasing importance. The role of machinery is likely to increase in both countries as the use of fire for vegetation management and general site preparation declines. To calculate the long-term cost–benefit of vegetation management, a better understanding of the crop growth response to these treatments is essential. This requires experiments that focus on the role of both crop and noncrop species in hydrological and nutrient cycles. Personal computer based decision support systems are likely to play an increasing role as an aid to cost-effective vegetation management decision making.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Radiata pine (Pinusradiata D. Don) is the predominant species in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand. Removal or suppression of noncrop vegetation is often carried out to enhance crop growth and survival by reducing competition for water, light, and nutrients. Other reasons for vegetation removal include microclimate modification, providing access into stands, and fire hazard reduction. Many studies have demonstrated large increases in crop growth from removing noncrop vegetation. Vegetation management can also mean introducing noncrop species to improve site quality, to suppress unwanted species, or to provide fodder for grazing. While herbicides are still the most widely used weed control tool, nonchemical methods are of increasing importance. The role of machinery is likely to increase in both countries as the use of fire for vegetation management and general site preparation declines. To calculate the long-term cost–benefit of vegetation management, a better understanding of the crop growth response to these treatments is essential. This requires experiments that focus on the role of both crop and noncrop species in hydrological and nutrient cycles. Personal computer based decision support systems are likely to play an increasing role as an aid to cost-effective vegetation management decision making.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 111 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Radiata pine (Pinusradiata D. Don) is the predominant species in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand. Removal or suppression of noncrop vegetation is often carried out to enhance crop growth and survival by reducing competition for water, light, and nutrients. Other reasons for vegetation removal include microclimate modification, providing access into stands, and fire hazard reduction. Many studies have demonstrated large increases in crop growth from removing noncrop vegetation. Vegetation management can also mean introducing noncrop species to improve site quality, to suppress unwanted species, or to provide fodder for grazing. While herbicides are still the most widely used weed control tool, nonchemical methods are of increasing importance. The role of machinery is likely to increase in both countries as the use of fire for vegetation management and general site preparation declines. To calculate the long-term cost–benefit of vegetation management, a better understanding of the crop growth response to these treatments is essential. This requires experiments that focus on the role of both crop and noncrop species in hydrological and nutrient cycles. Personal computer based decision support systems are likely to play an increasing role as an aid to cost-effective vegetation management decision making.

Key concepts: Vegetation (pathology), Environmental science, Microclimate, Agroforestry, Pinus radiata, Forest management, Forestry, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vegetation management practices in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand — Research Paper | ScholarLens