Iatrogenic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Treatment by Anterior Fibular and Iliac Arthrodesis
John G. Heller, Alexander J. Ghanayem, Paul C. McAfee, Henry H. Bohlman
Abstract
John G. Heller, Alexander J. Ghanayem, Paul C. McAfee, Henry H. Bohlman
Abstract
A retrospective independent radiographic and chart review was undertaken for 17 patients who underwent a unique anterior salvage procedure for iatrogenic and progressive postoperative spondylolisthesis. This one-stage anterior transabdominal discectomy, reduction, stabilization, and arthrodesis was first performed in 1979. Of the 17 patients, all complained of leg pain, 14 of back pain, 11 had neurogenic claudication, and 2 were bedridden preoperatively because of their pain. Of the 17 patients, 7 had no neurologic deficits, 2 had cauda equina syndrome, and the remaining 8 had motor root deficits. The average number of posterior operations before our salvage procedure was 1.8, with a range of 1 to 3. Eight patients had an average of 1.6 attempts at posterior arthrodesis, with a range of 1 to 3 procedures. Two patients had a grade I spondylolisthesis, 11 a grade II, and 4 a grade III. Follow-up was available for 16 patients from 2 years and 3 months to 11 years and 5 months after the index operation (mean, 6 years and 5 months). One patient with severe cardiovascular disease died perioperatively. This anterior procedure was able to restore spinal stability and decompress the neural elements in 13 of 16 patients. Eleven obtained a solid arthrodesis. Three patients required further spinal surgery: two posterior fusions for symptomatic nonunions and one posterior foraminotomy for persistent foraminal stenosis. No patient deteriorated neurologically, the two with cauda equina syndrome recovered, and all but one patient with motor root deficits recovered fully. At latest follow-up, there were six excellent, seven good, and three fair results. There were no poor results. Although technically difficult and troubled by complications, the relative historical merits and principles of this unique anterior salvage procedure probably warrant further consideration, especially in light of evolving anterior surgical technologies.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A retrospective independent radiographic and chart review was undertaken for 17 patients who underwent a unique anterior salvage procedure for iatrogenic and progressive postoperative spondylolisthesis. This one-stage anterior transabdominal discectomy, reduction, stabilization, and arthrodesis was first performed in 1979. Of the 17 patients, all complained of leg pain, 14 of back pain, 11 had neurogenic claudication, and 2 were bedridden preoperatively because of their pain. Of the 17 patients, 7 had no neurologic deficits, 2 had cauda equina syndrome, and the remaining 8 had motor root deficits. The average number of posterior operations before our salvage procedure was 1.8, with a range of 1 to 3. Eight patients had an average of 1.6 attempts at posterior arthrodesis, with a range of 1 to 3 procedures. Two patients had a grade I spondylolisthesis, 11 a grade II, and 4 a grade III. Follow-up was available for 16 patients from 2 years and 3 months to 11 years and 5 months after the index operation (mean, 6 years and 5 months). One patient with severe cardiovascular disease died perioperatively. This anterior procedure was able to restore spinal stability and decompress the neural elements in 13 of 16 patients. Eleven obtained a solid arthrodesis. Three patients required further spinal surgery: two posterior fusions for symptomatic nonunions and one posterior foraminotomy for persistent foraminal stenosis. No patient deteriorated neurologically, the two with cauda equina syndrome recovered, and all but one patient with motor root deficits recovered fully. At latest follow-up, there were six excellent, seven good, and three fair results. There were no poor results. Although technically difficult and troubled by complications, the relative historical merits and principles of this unique anterior salvage procedure probably warrant further consideration, especially in light of evolving anterior surgical technologies.
Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Spondylolisthesis, Arthrodesis, Cauda equina syndrome, Claudication, Lumbar, Facetectomy