1963American Journal of BotanyRequires access

A REVISION OF ARIOCARPUS (CACTACEAE). III. FORMAL TAXONOMY OF THE SUBGENUS ROSEOCACTUS

Edward F. Anderson

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Anderson, Edward F. (Whitman Coll., Walla Walla, Wash.) A revision of Ariocarpus (Cactaceae). III. Formal taxonomy of the subgenus Roseocactus. Amer. Jour. Bot. 50(7): 724–732. Illus. 1963.—This is the first of 2 articles dealing with the formal taxonomy of Ariocarpus. The introduction contains sections on geographical distribution and habitat, policy of classification, and herbaria consulted. Acknowledgments are made to those who assisted in research or field studies. A description of the genus and a key to the subgenera and species is followed by a formal taxonomic treatment of the subgenus Roseocactus. This treatment includes a description, illustrations, a map of authenticated collection sites, citation of common names, a discussion of synonomy and types, and a list of specimens examined of each species and variety. The accepted species which are discussed are Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus and A. fissuratus. The latter species consists of 2 varieties, var. fissuratus and var. lloydii.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Anderson, Edward F. (Whitman Coll., Walla Walla, Wash.) A revision of Ariocarpus (Cactaceae). III. Formal taxonomy of the subgenus Roseocactus. Amer. Jour. Bot. 50(7): 724–732. Illus. 1963.—This is the first of 2 articles dealing with the formal taxonomy of Ariocarpus. The introduction contains sections on geographical distribution and habitat, policy of classification, and herbaria consulted. Acknowledgments are made to those who assisted in research or field studies. A description of the genus and a key to the subgenera and species is followed by a formal taxonomic treatment of the subgenus Roseocactus. This treatment includes a description, illustrations, a map of authenticated collection sites, citation of common names, a discussion of synonomy and types, and a list of specimens examined of each species and variety. The accepted species which are discussed are Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus and A. fissuratus. The latter species consists of 2 varieties, var. fissuratus and var. lloydii.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Anderson, Edward F. (Whitman Coll., Walla Walla, Wash.) A revision of Ariocarpus (Cactaceae). III. Formal taxonomy of the subgenus Roseocactus. Amer. Jour. Bot. 50(7): 724–732. Illus. 1963.—This is the first of 2 articles dealing with the formal taxonomy of Ariocarpus. The introduction contains sections on geographical distribution and habitat, policy of classification, and herbaria consulted. Acknowledgments are made to those who assisted in research or field studies. A description of the genus and a key to the subgenera and species is followed by a formal taxonomic treatment of the subgenus Roseocactus. This treatment includes a description, illustrations, a map of authenticated collection sites, citation of common names, a discussion of synonomy and types, and a list of specimens examined of each species and variety. The accepted species which are discussed are Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus and A. fissuratus. The latter species consists of 2 varieties, var. fissuratus and var. lloydii.

Key concepts: Subgenus, Herbarium, Taxonomy (biology), Biology, Zoology, Key (lock), Botany, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A REVISION OF ARIOCARPUS (CACTACEAE). III. FORMAL TAXONOMY OF THE SUBGENUS ROSEOCACTUS — Research Paper | ScholarLens