2010•Education InquiryOpen access

Is “Excellent” good enough?

Knut Steinar Engelsen, Kari Smith

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

Both national and international evaluation studies have criticised Norwegian teachers for not being sufficiently specific and learning-oriented in their feedback practice. The feedback is largely characterised by general comments such as “Excellent” and “Good work”, and less by feed-forwardoriented messages informing students about what to do to improve their learning. In this paper we examine teachers’ feedback practice as part of a 3-year research and development project in two Norwegian primary schools. The students involved cover ages 9 to 12. Through the study we have aimed to develop a deeper understanding of how assessment practices among teachers are developed during practice and in dialogue with theory and research evidence, with a particular emphasis on how the teachers differentiated their teaching in relation to students with different abilities. The findings suggest that the teachers provide little and vague learning promoting to low-achieving students. It appears that these students most often receive feedback that is meant to strengthen their self-efficacy, rather than informative learning-oriented, feed-forward comments. A key question seems to be how to help those students in order to empower them as self-regulated learners.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both national and international evaluation studies have criticised Norwegian teachers for not being sufficiently specific and learning-oriented in their feedback practice. The feedback is largely characterised by general comments such as “Excellent” and “Good work”, and less by feed-forwardoriented messages informing students about what to do to improve their learning. In this paper we examine teachers’ feedback practice as part of a 3-year research and development project in two Norwegian primary schools. The students involved cover ages 9 to 12. Through the study we have aimed to develop a deeper understanding of how assessment practices among teachers are developed during practice and in dialogue with theory and research evidence, with a particular emphasis on how the teachers differentiated their teaching in relation to students with different abilities. The findings suggest that the teachers provide little and vague learning promoting to low-achieving students. It appears that these students most often receive feedback that is meant to strengthen their self-efficacy, rather than informative learning-oriented, feed-forward comments. A key question seems to be how to help those students in order to empower them as self-regulated learners.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both national and international evaluation studies have criticised Norwegian teachers for not being sufficiently specific and learning-oriented in their feedback practice. The feedback is largely characterised by general comments such as “Excellent” and “Good work”, and less by feed-forwardoriented messages informing students about what to do to improve their learning. In this paper we examine teachers’ feedback practice as part of a 3-year research and development project in two Norwegian primary schools. The students involved cover ages 9 to 12. Through the study we have aimed to develop a deeper understanding of how assessment practices among teachers are developed during practice and in dialogue with theory and research evidence, with a particular emphasis on how the teachers differentiated their teaching in relation to students with different abilities. The findings suggest that the teachers provide little and vague learning promoting to low-achieving students. It appears that these students most often receive feedback that is meant to strengthen their self-efficacy, rather than informative learning-oriented, feed-forward comments. A key question seems to be how to help those students in order to empower them as self-regulated learners.

Key concepts: Norwegian, Psychology, Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is “Excellent” good enough? — Research Paper | ScholarLens