2009OncologyRequires access

Antitumor Activity of the Pineal Gland: Effect of Unidentified Substances versus the Effect of Melatonin

Hella Bartsch, Christian Bartsch, Wolfgang Simon, Bertram Flehmig, I. Ebels, T. H. Lippert

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the pineal gland has antineoplastic properties which, however, can only partially be attributed to its hormone melatonin. While the in vivo tumor-inhibiting activity of melatonin is established, observations on its in vitro effects have been contradictory. The effect of this substance was investigated on six human cancer cell lines and compared to the activity of a partially purified, melatonin-free low molecular weight pineal extract (UMO5R). Melatonin showed hardly any effect but UMO5R was capable of inhibiting the growth of all the six cell lines tested. It is therefore concluded that a direct inhibiting action on tumor cells is not a general physiological role of melatonin as opposed to UMO5R. It will be worthwhile to purify the yet unidentified pineal antitumor activity since it may have a considerable therapeutic potential.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is growing evidence that the pineal gland has antineoplastic properties which, however, can only partially be attributed to its hormone melatonin. While the in vivo tumor-inhibiting activity of melatonin is established, observations on its in vitro effects have been contradictory. The effect of this substance was investigated on six human cancer cell lines and compared to the activity of a partially purified, melatonin-free low molecular weight pineal extract (UMO5R). Melatonin showed hardly any effect but UMO5R was capable of inhibiting the growth of all the six cell lines tested. It is therefore concluded that a direct inhibiting action on tumor cells is not a general physiological role of melatonin as opposed to UMO5R. It will be worthwhile to purify the yet unidentified pineal antitumor activity since it may have a considerable therapeutic potential.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is growing evidence that the pineal gland has antineoplastic properties which, however, can only partially be attributed to its hormone melatonin. While the in vivo tumor-inhibiting activity of melatonin is established, observations on its in vitro effects have been contradictory. The effect of this substance was investigated on six human cancer cell lines and compared to the activity of a partially purified, melatonin-free low molecular weight pineal extract (UMO5R). Melatonin showed hardly any effect but UMO5R was capable of inhibiting the growth of all the six cell lines tested. It is therefore concluded that a direct inhibiting action on tumor cells is not a general physiological role of melatonin as opposed to UMO5R. It will be worthwhile to purify the yet unidentified pineal antitumor activity since it may have a considerable therapeutic potential.

Key concepts: Melatonin, Pineal gland, In vivo, In vitro, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Cell culture, Hormone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antitumor Activity of the Pineal Gland: Effect of Unidentified Substances versus the Effect of Melatonin — Research Paper | ScholarLens