2005Journal of Information and Optimization SciencesRequires access

An analytical comparison of inventory costs of JIT and EOQ purchasing with defective products

Wen‐Hung Kuo

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an alternative model of Fazel et al. [7] to represent a more realistic inventory management environment. The modified model accounts for certain defective products in the economic order quantity (EOQ) purchasing model and just-in-time (JIT) purchasing system. By comparing the total annual cost of the EOQ purchasing model and the JIT purchasing system, we discuss the superiority changes between the two systems under different demand levels, penalty costs and defective product percentages. Moreover, we show that both product quality and penalty cost have a great impact on the effect of the JIT purchasing system. If we want to adopt a JIT purchasing system the perfect quality of products and penalty cost of the defective products should be very important factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we propose an alternative model of Fazel et al. [7] to represent a more realistic inventory management environment. The modified model accounts for certain defective products in the economic order quantity (EOQ) purchasing model and just-in-time (JIT) purchasing system. By comparing the total annual cost of the EOQ purchasing model and the JIT purchasing system, we discuss the superiority changes between the two systems under different demand levels, penalty costs and defective product percentages. Moreover, we show that both product quality and penalty cost have a great impact on the effect of the JIT purchasing system. If we want to adopt a JIT purchasing system the perfect quality of products and penalty cost of the defective products should be very important factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we propose an alternative model of Fazel et al. [7] to represent a more realistic inventory management environment. The modified model accounts for certain defective products in the economic order quantity (EOQ) purchasing model and just-in-time (JIT) purchasing system. By comparing the total annual cost of the EOQ purchasing model and the JIT purchasing system, we discuss the superiority changes between the two systems under different demand levels, penalty costs and defective product percentages. Moreover, we show that both product quality and penalty cost have a great impact on the effect of the JIT purchasing system. If we want to adopt a JIT purchasing system the perfect quality of products and penalty cost of the defective products should be very important factors.

Key concepts: Purchasing, Economic order quantity, Product (mathematics), Quality (philosophy), Order (exchange), Holding cost, Microeconomics, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An analytical comparison of inventory costs of JIT and EOQ purchasing with defective products — Research Paper | ScholarLens