1973Agronomy JournalRequires access

Water Loss from an Irrigated Sorghum Field: II. Evapotranspiration and Root Extraction1

L. R. Stone, M. L. Horton, T. C. Olson

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Abstract Techniques for estimating evapotranspiration from water depletion within the soil profile frequently do not account for flux below the root zone. A method using tensiometers for obtaining evapotranspiration rates and root extraction patterns within an actively growing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) crop is discussed. Profile water depletion was calculated from water content profiles determined using tensiometer readings and laboratory‐measured soil water characteristics. Profile water depletion minus flux below the root zone yielded the daily evapotranspiration rate. During the 31‐day study, approximately 65% of the total water loss was due to evapotranspiration and approximately 35% was due to flux loss from the root zone. These data clearly show the importance of considering flux below the root zone when attempting to determine evapotranspiration rates using depletion methods. The method of determining evapotranspiration rates illustrated in this paper provides an alternative to the microclimatological and lysimeter methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Techniques for estimating evapotranspiration from water depletion within the soil profile frequently do not account for flux below the root zone. A method using tensiometers for obtaining evapotranspiration rates and root extraction patterns within an actively growing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) crop is discussed. Profile water depletion was calculated from water content profiles determined using tensiometer readings and laboratory‐measured soil water characteristics. Profile water depletion minus flux below the root zone yielded the daily evapotranspiration rate. During the 31‐day study, approximately 65% of the total water loss was due to evapotranspiration and approximately 35% was due to flux loss from the root zone. These data clearly show the importance of considering flux below the root zone when attempting to determine evapotranspiration rates using depletion methods. The method of determining evapotranspiration rates illustrated in this paper provides an alternative to the microclimatological and lysimeter methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Techniques for estimating evapotranspiration from water depletion within the soil profile frequently do not account for flux below the root zone. A method using tensiometers for obtaining evapotranspiration rates and root extraction patterns within an actively growing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) crop is discussed. Profile water depletion was calculated from water content profiles determined using tensiometer readings and laboratory‐measured soil water characteristics. Profile water depletion minus flux below the root zone yielded the daily evapotranspiration rate. During the 31‐day study, approximately 65% of the total water loss was due to evapotranspiration and approximately 35% was due to flux loss from the root zone. These data clearly show the importance of considering flux below the root zone when attempting to determine evapotranspiration rates using depletion methods. The method of determining evapotranspiration rates illustrated in this paper provides an alternative to the microclimatological and lysimeter methods.

Key concepts: Lysimeter, Evapotranspiration, DNS root zone, Sorghum, Environmental science, Soil water, Flux (metallurgy), Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Water Loss from an Irrigated Sorghum Field: II. Evapotranspiration and Root Extraction1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens