2011Journal Of Clinical PeriodontologyRequires access

Peri‐implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5‐year follow‐up

Fernando Oliveira Costa, Satoshi Takenaka‐Martinez, Luís Otávio Miranda Cota, Sérgio Diniz Ferreira, Geraldo Lúcio Magalhães Silva, José Eustáquio Costa

Open publisher page 501 citations

Abstract

AIM: To determine the incidence of peri-implantitis in individuals with mucositis in a 5-year follow-up study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 212 partially edentulous individuals, rehabilitated with dental implants, underwent periodontal and peri-implant clinical examinations in 2005 (baseline). Five years later, 80 individuals who had been diagnosed with mucositis in the baseline examination were re-examined. These individuals were divided into two groups: one group with preventive maintenance during the study period (GTP; n = 39), and another group without preventive maintenance (GNTP; n = 41). The following parameters were clinically evaluated: plaque index, bleeding on periodontal and peri-implant probing, periodontal and peri-implant probing depth, suppuration and peri-implant bone loss. The influence of biological and behavioural risk variables associated with the occurrence of peri-implantitis was analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of peri-implantitis in the global sample was 31.2% (GNTP = 43.9% and GTP = 18.0%). CONCLUSION: The absence of preventive maintenance in individuals with pre-existing peri-implant mucositis was associated with a high incidence of peri-implantitis. Clinical parameters, such as bleeding on peri-implant probing, periodontal probing depth and the presence of periodontitis were associated with a higher risk of developing peri-implantitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To determine the incidence of peri-implantitis in individuals with mucositis in a 5-year follow-up study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 212 partially edentulous individuals, rehabilitated with dental implants, underwent periodontal and peri-implant clinical examinations in 2005 (baseline). Five years later, 80 individuals who had been diagnosed with mucositis in the baseline examination were re-examined. These individuals were divided into two groups: one group with preventive maintenance during the study period (GTP; n = 39), and another group without preventive maintenance (GNTP; n = 41). The following parameters were clinically evaluated: plaque index, bleeding on periodontal and peri-implant probing, periodontal and peri-implant probing depth, suppuration and peri-implant bone loss. The influence of biological and behavioural risk variables associated with the occurrence of peri-implantitis was analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of peri-implantitis in the global sample was 31.2% (GNTP = 43.9% and GTP = 18.0%). CONCLUSION: The absence of preventive maintenance in individuals with pre-existing peri-implant mucositis was associated with a high incidence of peri-implantitis. Clinical parameters, such as bleeding on peri-implant probing, periodontal probing depth and the presence of periodontitis were associated with a higher risk of developing peri-implantitis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 501 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To determine the incidence of peri-implantitis in individuals with mucositis in a 5-year follow-up study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 212 partially edentulous individuals, rehabilitated with dental implants, underwent periodontal and peri-implant clinical examinations in 2005 (baseline). Five years later, 80 individuals who had been diagnosed with mucositis in the baseline examination were re-examined. These individuals were divided into two groups: one group with preventive maintenance during the study period (GTP; n = 39), and another group without preventive maintenance (GNTP; n = 41). The following parameters were clinically evaluated: plaque index, bleeding on periodontal and peri-implant probing, periodontal and peri-implant probing depth, suppuration and peri-implant bone loss. The influence of biological and behavioural risk variables associated with the occurrence of peri-implantitis was analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of peri-implantitis in the global sample was 31.2% (GNTP = 43.9% and GTP = 18.0%). CONCLUSION: The absence of preventive maintenance in individuals with pre-existing peri-implant mucositis was associated with a high incidence of peri-implantitis. Clinical parameters, such as bleeding on peri-implant probing, periodontal probing depth and the presence of periodontitis were associated with a higher risk of developing peri-implantitis.

Key concepts: Peri-implantitis, Mucositis, Medicine, Dentistry, Bleeding on probing, Implant, Incidence (geometry), Periodontitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peri‐implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5‐year follow‐up — Research Paper | ScholarLens