2011EpigeneticsOpen access

Assessment of methylation level prediction accuracy in methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation and sodium bisulfite based microarray platforms

Rageen Rajendram, José Carlos Ferreira, Daria Grafodatskaya, Sanaa Choufani, Theodore Chiang, Shuye Pu, Darci T. Butcher, Shoshana J. Wodak, Rosanna Weksberg

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

In this study, we verified the accuracy of two array methods--methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled with CpG island microarrays (MeDIP-CGI-arrays) and sodium bisulfite conversion based microarrays (BC-arrays)--in predicting regional methylation levels as measured by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA (BC-pyrosequencing). To test the accuracy of these methods we used the Agilent Human CpG island and the Illumina HumanMethylation27 microarrays respectively, and compared microarray outputs to the data from targeted BC-pyrosequencing assays from several genomic regions of corresponding samples. We observed relatively high correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data for both array platforms, R = 0.87 for BC-Array and R = 0.79 for MeDIP-CGI array. However, MeDIP-CGI array were less reliable in predicting intermediate levels of DNA methylation. Several bioinformatics strategies, to ameliorate the performance of the MeDIP-CGI-Arrays did not improve the correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data. The high scalability, low cost and simpler analysis of BC-arrays, together with the recent extended coverage may make them a more versatile methylation analysis tool.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we verified the accuracy of two array methods--methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled with CpG island microarrays (MeDIP-CGI-arrays) and sodium bisulfite conversion based microarrays (BC-arrays)--in predicting regional methylation levels as measured by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA (BC-pyrosequencing). To test the accuracy of these methods we used the Agilent Human CpG island and the Illumina HumanMethylation27 microarrays respectively, and compared microarray outputs to the data from targeted BC-pyrosequencing assays from several genomic regions of corresponding samples. We observed relatively high correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data for both array platforms, R = 0.87 for BC-Array and R = 0.79 for MeDIP-CGI array. However, MeDIP-CGI array were less reliable in predicting intermediate levels of DNA methylation. Several bioinformatics strategies, to ameliorate the performance of the MeDIP-CGI-Arrays did not improve the correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data. The high scalability, low cost and simpler analysis of BC-arrays, together with the recent extended coverage may make them a more versatile methylation analysis tool.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we verified the accuracy of two array methods--methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled with CpG island microarrays (MeDIP-CGI-arrays) and sodium bisulfite conversion based microarrays (BC-arrays)--in predicting regional methylation levels as measured by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA (BC-pyrosequencing). To test the accuracy of these methods we used the Agilent Human CpG island and the Illumina HumanMethylation27 microarrays respectively, and compared microarray outputs to the data from targeted BC-pyrosequencing assays from several genomic regions of corresponding samples. We observed relatively high correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data for both array platforms, R = 0.87 for BC-Array and R = 0.79 for MeDIP-CGI array. However, MeDIP-CGI array were less reliable in predicting intermediate levels of DNA methylation. Several bioinformatics strategies, to ameliorate the performance of the MeDIP-CGI-Arrays did not improve the correlation with BC-pyrosequencing data. The high scalability, low cost and simpler analysis of BC-arrays, together with the recent extended coverage may make them a more versatile methylation analysis tool.

Key concepts: Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, Pyrosequencing, Bisulfite sequencing, Biology, DNA methylation, DNA microarray, Methylation, CpG site

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of methylation level prediction accuracy in methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation and sodium bisulfite based microarray platforms — Research Paper | ScholarLens