1984Australian & New Zealand Journal of CriminologyRequires access

Levels of Custody and Attitude Differences Among Prison Officers: A Comparative Study

Trevor A Williams, Geoffrey N. Soutar

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Research reported in a previous paper (Williams, 1983) suggests that the extent of prison officers' role in maintaining custodial control may be an important variable affecting their attitudes towards disciplinary authority, inmates, and non-custodial staff. This implies that officers working in institutions with different levels of custodial confinement may also vary in their attitudes towards these dimensions. An analysis of responses from officers in prison institutions suggests that attitudes between institutional types do vary significantly. The analysis identified differences between the maximum security prison and non-maximum security prisons, while “treatment institutions” did not appear to be significantly different. However, officers in the female institution appear to hold quite distinctive role orientations and attitudes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research reported in a previous paper (Williams, 1983) suggests that the extent of prison officers' role in maintaining custodial control may be an important variable affecting their attitudes towards disciplinary authority, inmates, and non-custodial staff. This implies that officers working in institutions with different levels of custodial confinement may also vary in their attitudes towards these dimensions. An analysis of responses from officers in prison institutions suggests that attitudes between institutional types do vary significantly. The analysis identified differences between the maximum security prison and non-maximum security prisons, while “treatment institutions” did not appear to be significantly different. However, officers in the female institution appear to hold quite distinctive role orientations and attitudes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research reported in a previous paper (Williams, 1983) suggests that the extent of prison officers' role in maintaining custodial control may be an important variable affecting their attitudes towards disciplinary authority, inmates, and non-custodial staff. This implies that officers working in institutions with different levels of custodial confinement may also vary in their attitudes towards these dimensions. An analysis of responses from officers in prison institutions suggests that attitudes between institutional types do vary significantly. The analysis identified differences between the maximum security prison and non-maximum security prisons, while “treatment institutions” did not appear to be significantly different. However, officers in the female institution appear to hold quite distinctive role orientations and attitudes.

Key concepts: Prison, Maximum security, Institution, Criminology, Discipline, Psychology, Social psychology, Total institution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Levels of Custody and Attitude Differences Among Prison Officers: A Comparative Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens