Random X inactivation in a girl with a balanced t(X;9) and an abnormal phenotype
Daynna J. Wolff, Stuart Schwartz, Thomas R. Montgomery, Joleen L. Zackowski
Abstract
Daynna J. Wolff, Stuart Schwartz, Thomas R. Montgomery, Joleen L. Zackowski
Abstract
X inactivation is the process by which mammalian females achieve dosage compensation by transcriptionally silencing one X chromosome. In chromosomally normal females, this process is random. However, most females with one abnormal X chromosome demonstrate complete skewing of X inactivation, presumably as the result of cell selection. We present a mentally retarded girl with a 46,X,t(X;9)(q28;q12) karyotype. Analysis of this patient's lymphocytes, using late replication banding and methylation assays for the androgen receptor (AR) and fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) genes, did not show the predicted nonrandom X inactivation pattern. Thus, this patient is functionally disomic for Xq28-qter in a proportion of her cells, most likely resulting in her abnormal phenotype. This case demonstrates the utility of correlating X inactivation patterns with phenotype in females with one structurally abnormal X chromosome, and suggests that both cytogenetic and molecular X inactivation studies should be included in the routine study of these individuals.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
X inactivation is the process by which mammalian females achieve dosage compensation by transcriptionally silencing one X chromosome. In chromosomally normal females, this process is random. However, most females with one abnormal X chromosome demonstrate complete skewing of X inactivation, presumably as the result of cell selection. We present a mentally retarded girl with a 46,X,t(X;9)(q28;q12) karyotype. Analysis of this patient's lymphocytes, using late replication banding and methylation assays for the androgen receptor (AR) and fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) genes, did not show the predicted nonrandom X inactivation pattern. Thus, this patient is functionally disomic for Xq28-qter in a proportion of her cells, most likely resulting in her abnormal phenotype. This case demonstrates the utility of correlating X inactivation patterns with phenotype in females with one structurally abnormal X chromosome, and suggests that both cytogenetic and molecular X inactivation studies should be included in the routine study of these individuals.
Key concepts: Skewed X-inactivation, X-inactivation, Dosage compensation, X chromosome, Biology, Karyotype, Phenotype, Xq28