1993•Studies in Higher EducationRequires access

Does supplemental instruction really work and what is it anyway?

Dennis H. Congos, Nancy B. Schoeps

Open publisher page 98 citations

Abstract

Supplemental instruction (SI) has been in existence in the USA since the late 1970s but too many institutions still do not realize the range of academic benefits for students from this program. The researchers describe an SI program in the USA at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte from 1987 to 1990. They present inferential statistical data on the impact of this form of assistance on student academic performance as a measure of learning. The results indicate that students attending SI sessions earn higher final grade averages and receive fewer low grades and withdrawals than non-attendees. These favorable results are so in spite of the fact that SI attendees enter college with lower predicted academic potential and indicators of industriousness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Supplemental instruction (SI) has been in existence in the USA since the late 1970s but too many institutions still do not realize the range of academic benefits for students from this program. The researchers describe an SI program in the USA at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte from 1987 to 1990. They present inferential statistical data on the impact of this form of assistance on student academic performance as a measure of learning. The results indicate that students attending SI sessions earn higher final grade averages and receive fewer low grades and withdrawals than non-attendees. These favorable results are so in spite of the fact that SI attendees enter college with lower predicted academic potential and indicators of industriousness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 98 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Supplemental instruction (SI) has been in existence in the USA since the late 1970s but too many institutions still do not realize the range of academic benefits for students from this program. The researchers describe an SI program in the USA at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte from 1987 to 1990. They present inferential statistical data on the impact of this form of assistance on student academic performance as a measure of learning. The results indicate that students attending SI sessions earn higher final grade averages and receive fewer low grades and withdrawals than non-attendees. These favorable results are so in spite of the fact that SI attendees enter college with lower predicted academic potential and indicators of industriousness.

Key concepts: Higher education, Academic achievement, Mathematics education, Statistical analysis, Psychology, Work (physics), Medical education, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does supplemental instruction really work and what is it anyway? — Research Paper | ScholarLens