2007The Astrophysical JournalOpen access

The Coronal Heating Paradox

Markus J. Aschwanden, Amy R. Winebarger, D. Tsiklauri, Hardi Peter

Open full text 143 citations

Abstract

The "coronal heating problem" has been with us over 60 years, and hundreds of theoretical models have been proposed without an obvious solution in sight. In this paper we point out that observations show no evidence for local heating in the solar corona, but rather for heating below the corona in the transition region and upper chromosphere, with subsequent chromospheric evaporation as known in flares. New observational evidence for this scenario comes from (1) the temperature evolution of coronal loops, (2) the overdensity of hot coronal loops, (3) upflows in coronal loops, (4) the Doppler shift in coronal loops, (5) upward propagating waves, (6) the energy balance in coronal loops, (7) the magnetic complexity in the transition region, (8) the altitude of nanoflares and microflares, (9) the cross section of elementary loops, as well as (10) 3D MHD simulations of coronal heating. The phrase "coronal heating problem" is therefore a paradoxical misnomer for what should rather be addressed as the "chromospheric heating problem" and "coronal loop filling process." This paradigm shift substantially reduces the number of relevant theoretical models for coronal heating in active regions and the quiet Sun, but our arguments do not apply to coronal holes and the extended heliospheric corona.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The "coronal heating problem" has been with us over 60 years, and hundreds of theoretical models have been proposed without an obvious solution in sight. In this paper we point out that observations show no evidence for local heating in the solar corona, but rather for heating below the corona in the transition region and upper chromosphere, with subsequent chromospheric evaporation as known in flares. New observational evidence for this scenario comes from (1) the temperature evolution of coronal loops, (2) the overdensity of hot coronal loops, (3) upflows in coronal loops, (4) the Doppler shift in coronal loops, (5) upward propagating waves, (6) the energy balance in coronal loops, (7) the magnetic complexity in the transition region, (8) the altitude of nanoflares and microflares, (9) the cross section of elementary loops, as well as (10) 3D MHD simulations of coronal heating. The phrase "coronal heating problem" is therefore a paradoxical misnomer for what should rather be addressed as the "chromospheric heating problem" and "coronal loop filling process." This paradigm shift substantially reduces the number of relevant theoretical models for coronal heating in active regions and the quiet Sun, but our arguments do not apply to coronal holes and the extended heliospheric corona.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 143 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The "coronal heating problem" has been with us over 60 years, and hundreds of theoretical models have been proposed without an obvious solution in sight. In this paper we point out that observations show no evidence for local heating in the solar corona, but rather for heating below the corona in the transition region and upper chromosphere, with subsequent chromospheric evaporation as known in flares. New observational evidence for this scenario comes from (1) the temperature evolution of coronal loops, (2) the overdensity of hot coronal loops, (3) upflows in coronal loops, (4) the Doppler shift in coronal loops, (5) upward propagating waves, (6) the energy balance in coronal loops, (7) the magnetic complexity in the transition region, (8) the altitude of nanoflares and microflares, (9) the cross section of elementary loops, as well as (10) 3D MHD simulations of coronal heating. The phrase "coronal heating problem" is therefore a paradoxical misnomer for what should rather be addressed as the "chromospheric heating problem" and "coronal loop filling process." This paradigm shift substantially reduces the number of relevant theoretical models for coronal heating in active regions and the quiet Sun, but our arguments do not apply to coronal holes and the extended heliospheric corona.

Key concepts: Coronal loop, Physics, Nanoflares, Corona (planetary geology), Astrophysics, Coronal cloud, Coronal hole, Coronal radiative losses

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Coronal Heating Paradox — Research Paper | ScholarLens