2013Alimentary Pharmacology & TherapeuticsOpen access

Commentary: fibroblast growth factor 19 in patients with bile acid diarrhoea

Michael Camilleri, Andrés Acosta

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The recent paper by Pattni et al.1 has the potential to change clinical practice in the assessment of patients with unexplained diarrhoea, often attributed to diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).2 It builds on the seminal observations by Walters et al.3 that ileal enterocyte secretion of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF-19) is deficient in patients with so-called secondary bile acid diarrhoea (BAD). In their prospective comparison of serum FGF-19 and 75SeHCAT retention, Pattni et al. confirm the overall relationship between the two measurements, and the inverse relationship (as previously demonstrated by several groups)4, 5 between serum FGF-19 and serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4). These data reinforce the prior conclusion that reduced ileal FGF-19 secretion is a feature of BAD.3 There are four tools that directly measure BA malabsorption: 14C-glycocholate breath and stool test, 75SeHCAT, C4, and faecal total and individual BAs. The pros and cons of these tests are summarised in Table 1.6 The most widely used method for diagnosis of BAD is a therapeutic trial of bile acid binders with symptom improvement. The paper by Pattni et al. has additional value, as it assesses the potential to use serum FGF-19 as a screen for BAD. The ROC curves showing FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL to predict 75SeHCAT values <10% or <5% were 58% (95% CI: 42–72) and 67% (95% CI 38–87). A full response to bile acid sequestrants occurred in 15 of the 16 patients with FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL, but in only 50% of those with higher values. The FGF-19 assay is based on a simple, inexpensive commercial ELISA; in contrast, other diagnostic methods (C4 and faecal bile acids) require high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and/or 48 h stool collection. The ability to screen for BAD with serum FGF-19 could dramatically change clinical practice in the assessment and management of diarrhoea in patients with either inflammatory bowel disease or IBS-D. Declaration of personal and funding interests: Dr Camilleri is funded by NIH DK92179.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recent paper by Pattni et al.1 has the potential to change clinical practice in the assessment of patients with unexplained diarrhoea, often attributed to diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).2 It builds on the seminal observations by Walters et al.3 that ileal enterocyte secretion of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF-19) is deficient in patients with so-called secondary bile acid diarrhoea (BAD). In their prospective comparison of serum FGF-19 and 75SeHCAT retention, Pattni et al. confirm the overall relationship between the two measurements, and the inverse relationship (as previously demonstrated by several groups)4, 5 between serum FGF-19 and serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4). These data reinforce the prior conclusion that reduced ileal FGF-19 secretion is a feature of BAD.3 There are four tools that directly measure BA malabsorption: 14C-glycocholate breath and stool test, 75SeHCAT, C4, and faecal total and individual BAs. The pros and cons of these tests are summarised in Table 1.6 The most widely used method for diagnosis of BAD is a therapeutic trial of bile acid binders with symptom improvement. The paper by Pattni et al. has additional value, as it assesses the potential to use serum FGF-19 as a screen for BAD. The ROC curves showing FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL to predict 75SeHCAT values <10% or <5% were 58% (95% CI: 42–72) and 67% (95% CI 38–87). A full response to bile acid sequestrants occurred in 15 of the 16 patients with FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL, but in only 50% of those with higher values. The FGF-19 assay is based on a simple, inexpensive commercial ELISA; in contrast, other diagnostic methods (C4 and faecal bile acids) require high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and/or 48 h stool collection. The ability to screen for BAD with serum FGF-19 could dramatically change clinical practice in the assessment and management of diarrhoea in patients with either inflammatory bowel disease or IBS-D. Declaration of personal and funding interests: Dr Camilleri is funded by NIH DK92179.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recent paper by Pattni et al.1 has the potential to change clinical practice in the assessment of patients with unexplained diarrhoea, often attributed to diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).2 It builds on the seminal observations by Walters et al.3 that ileal enterocyte secretion of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF-19) is deficient in patients with so-called secondary bile acid diarrhoea (BAD). In their prospective comparison of serum FGF-19 and 75SeHCAT retention, Pattni et al. confirm the overall relationship between the two measurements, and the inverse relationship (as previously demonstrated by several groups)4, 5 between serum FGF-19 and serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4). These data reinforce the prior conclusion that reduced ileal FGF-19 secretion is a feature of BAD.3 There are four tools that directly measure BA malabsorption: 14C-glycocholate breath and stool test, 75SeHCAT, C4, and faecal total and individual BAs. The pros and cons of these tests are summarised in Table 1.6 The most widely used method for diagnosis of BAD is a therapeutic trial of bile acid binders with symptom improvement. The paper by Pattni et al. has additional value, as it assesses the potential to use serum FGF-19 as a screen for BAD. The ROC curves showing FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL to predict 75SeHCAT values <10% or <5% were 58% (95% CI: 42–72) and 67% (95% CI 38–87). A full response to bile acid sequestrants occurred in 15 of the 16 patients with FGF-19 ≤145 pg/mL, but in only 50% of those with higher values. The FGF-19 assay is based on a simple, inexpensive commercial ELISA; in contrast, other diagnostic methods (C4 and faecal bile acids) require high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and/or 48 h stool collection. The ability to screen for BAD with serum FGF-19 could dramatically change clinical practice in the assessment and management of diarrhoea in patients with either inflammatory bowel disease or IBS-D. Declaration of personal and funding interests: Dr Camilleri is funded by NIH DK92179.

Key concepts: Bile acid malabsorption, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Bile acid, Irritable bowel syndrome, Malabsorption, Fibroblast growth factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commentary: fibroblast growth factor 19 in patients with bile acid diarrhoea — Research Paper | ScholarLens