Using ESEM and SEM to compare the performance of dentin conditioners
Lynn C. Gilbert, Robert Doherty
Abstract
Lynn C. Gilbert, Robert Doherty
Abstract
A comparison of four dentinal conditioners was performed utilizing a traditional scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a new technology, the ElectroScan environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Both ESEM and SEM analysis verified current theorized mechanisms of adhesion to dentin surfaces. ESEM images appeared to more closely approximate what one would expect cut and treated dentin surfaces look like. Increases in information from the "surfaces" of uncoated specimens and the reduction in specimen preparation time were associated with ESEM analysis.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison of four dentinal conditioners was performed utilizing a traditional scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a new technology, the ElectroScan environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Both ESEM and SEM analysis verified current theorized mechanisms of adhesion to dentin surfaces. ESEM images appeared to more closely approximate what one would expect cut and treated dentin surfaces look like. Increases in information from the "surfaces" of uncoated specimens and the reduction in specimen preparation time were associated with ESEM analysis.
Key concepts: Environmental scanning electron microscope, Dentin, Conditioners, Conditioning, Materials science, Composite material, Scanning electron microscope, Mathematics