2006Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Transit Attractiveness: Systematic Approach to Transit Performance Measurement

Jan Kopp, Joseph A Moriarty, Mark E. Pitstick

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Transit performance measures typically have focused on attributes of service supply, such as capacity, passenger loading, frequency, and reliability. These measures are effective in describing the quality of transit service available at a given location, but they do not describe how well transit serves actual passenger trips from that location to potential destinations. To support the Regional Transportation Authority's objective of increasing the total number of trips for which transit is an attractive travel alternative, a methodology was developed to evaluate the relative attractiveness of travel by public transit and personal automobile on a sample of origin–destination pairs throughout the Chicago, Illinois, metropolitan region. Transit attractiveness was computed by using a logit mode choice framework that compared the utility of travel by transit, auto, and park-and-ride for various components of travel time and travel cost. To make the comparisons as customer-focused as possible, travel utility between the sampled origins and destinations was derived from actual automobile and transit itineraries generated by publicly available web-based trip planners. This paper describes the methodology and how it was applied in northeastern Illinois to identify ways to serve activity centers better by improving transit accessibility from many other places, and it discusses potential ways of generalizing the approach for use in other regions faced with similar challenges in planning transit systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transit performance measures typically have focused on attributes of service supply, such as capacity, passenger loading, frequency, and reliability. These measures are effective in describing the quality of transit service available at a given location, but they do not describe how well transit serves actual passenger trips from that location to potential destinations. To support the Regional Transportation Authority's objective of increasing the total number of trips for which transit is an attractive travel alternative, a methodology was developed to evaluate the relative attractiveness of travel by public transit and personal automobile on a sample of origin–destination pairs throughout the Chicago, Illinois, metropolitan region. Transit attractiveness was computed by using a logit mode choice framework that compared the utility of travel by transit, auto, and park-and-ride for various components of travel time and travel cost. To make the comparisons as customer-focused as possible, travel utility between the sampled origins and destinations was derived from actual automobile and transit itineraries generated by publicly available web-based trip planners. This paper describes the methodology and how it was applied in northeastern Illinois to identify ways to serve activity centers better by improving transit accessibility from many other places, and it discusses potential ways of generalizing the approach for use in other regions faced with similar challenges in planning transit systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transit performance measures typically have focused on attributes of service supply, such as capacity, passenger loading, frequency, and reliability. These measures are effective in describing the quality of transit service available at a given location, but they do not describe how well transit serves actual passenger trips from that location to potential destinations. To support the Regional Transportation Authority's objective of increasing the total number of trips for which transit is an attractive travel alternative, a methodology was developed to evaluate the relative attractiveness of travel by public transit and personal automobile on a sample of origin–destination pairs throughout the Chicago, Illinois, metropolitan region. Transit attractiveness was computed by using a logit mode choice framework that compared the utility of travel by transit, auto, and park-and-ride for various components of travel time and travel cost. To make the comparisons as customer-focused as possible, travel utility between the sampled origins and destinations was derived from actual automobile and transit itineraries generated by publicly available web-based trip planners. This paper describes the methodology and how it was applied in northeastern Illinois to identify ways to serve activity centers better by improving transit accessibility from many other places, and it discusses potential ways of generalizing the approach for use in other regions faced with similar challenges in planning transit systems.

Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Destinations, Public transport, TRIPS architecture, Attractiveness, Metropolitan area, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transit Attractiveness: Systematic Approach to Transit Performance Measurement — Research Paper | ScholarLens