2001Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related TechnologiesRequires access

RAPID METHOD FOR ESTIMATING OCTANOL-WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT (LOG POCT) FROM ISOCRATIC RP-HPLC AND A HYDROGEN BOND ACIDITY TERM (A)

Chau My Du, Klára Valkó, Chris Bevan, Derek P. Reynolds, Michael H. Abraham

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

The linear solvation equation approach has been used to describe the octanol/water lipophilicity scale (logPoct) and the isocratic retention factors (log k) obtained using reversed phase HPLC with acetonitrile. Both the octanol/water partition coefficients and the RP-HPLC retention data obtained from the literature, showed good correlation with the molecular descriptors such as size, excess molar refractivity, H-bond acidity/basicity, and polarity/dipolarity. However, the impact of the H-bond acidity term was very different on the two lipophilicity scales. The H-bond acidity term was not significant in describing the octanol/water lipophilicity, while the H-bond acidity of the molecules decreased significantly their RP-HPLC retention. As the other terms had very similar impact on the two lipophilicity scales, it made it possible to convert one scale to the other by incorporating only the H-bond acidity of the compounds as is shown by the equation below, where A is the compound H-bond acidity. Using the simpler hydrogen bond donor counts (HBC) also helped to align the two lipophilicity scales to each other. The validity of the above equations was tested using a test set of 41 drug compounds with our measured data. The log Poct values were estimated from isocratic RP-HPLC retention data with the H-bond acidity term and counts, with an error of 0.284 and 0.325 log unit, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The linear solvation equation approach has been used to describe the octanol/water lipophilicity scale (logPoct) and the isocratic retention factors (log k) obtained using reversed phase HPLC with acetonitrile. Both the octanol/water partition coefficients and the RP-HPLC retention data obtained from the literature, showed good correlation with the molecular descriptors such as size, excess molar refractivity, H-bond acidity/basicity, and polarity/dipolarity. However, the impact of the H-bond acidity term was very different on the two lipophilicity scales. The H-bond acidity term was not significant in describing the octanol/water lipophilicity, while the H-bond acidity of the molecules decreased significantly their RP-HPLC retention. As the other terms had very similar impact on the two lipophilicity scales, it made it possible to convert one scale to the other by incorporating only the H-bond acidity of the compounds as is shown by the equation below, where A is the compound H-bond acidity. Using the simpler hydrogen bond donor counts (HBC) also helped to align the two lipophilicity scales to each other. The validity of the above equations was tested using a test set of 41 drug compounds with our measured data. The log Poct values were estimated from isocratic RP-HPLC retention data with the H-bond acidity term and counts, with an error of 0.284 and 0.325 log unit, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The linear solvation equation approach has been used to describe the octanol/water lipophilicity scale (logPoct) and the isocratic retention factors (log k) obtained using reversed phase HPLC with acetonitrile. Both the octanol/water partition coefficients and the RP-HPLC retention data obtained from the literature, showed good correlation with the molecular descriptors such as size, excess molar refractivity, H-bond acidity/basicity, and polarity/dipolarity. However, the impact of the H-bond acidity term was very different on the two lipophilicity scales. The H-bond acidity term was not significant in describing the octanol/water lipophilicity, while the H-bond acidity of the molecules decreased significantly their RP-HPLC retention. As the other terms had very similar impact on the two lipophilicity scales, it made it possible to convert one scale to the other by incorporating only the H-bond acidity of the compounds as is shown by the equation below, where A is the compound H-bond acidity. Using the simpler hydrogen bond donor counts (HBC) also helped to align the two lipophilicity scales to each other. The validity of the above equations was tested using a test set of 41 drug compounds with our measured data. The log Poct values were estimated from isocratic RP-HPLC retention data with the H-bond acidity term and counts, with an error of 0.284 and 0.325 log unit, respectively.

Key concepts: Lipophilicity, Chemistry, Partition coefficient, Octanol, Solvation, High-performance liquid chromatography, Hydrogen bond, Acetonitrile

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RAPID METHOD FOR ESTIMATING OCTANOL-WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT (LOG POCT) FROM ISOCRATIC RP-HPLC AND A HYDROGEN BOND ACIDITY TERM (A) — Research Paper | ScholarLens