An experimental and theoretical study of low-aspect ration swept andoblique wings at Mach numbers between 0.6 and 1.4
E. J. Hopkins, A. LEVIN
Abstract
E. J. Hopkins, A. LEVIN
Abstract
Experimental forces and moments for two wing-body combinations having (a) a swept wing and (b) an oblique wing are compared. At all Mach numbers, the oblique wing (at its optimum sweep angle) had higher maximum lift-to-drag ratios than the fixed, swept wing. At high angles of attack, the direction of the pitching or rolling tendencies of the oblique wing was a function of the spanwise distribution of wing bend or washout for the two bends being investigated. At low angles of attack, linear theory gave satisfactory predictions of the subsonic lift-curve slope, the aerodynamic-center travel with Mach number, and the maximum lift-to-drag ratio.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Experimental forces and moments for two wing-body combinations having (a) a swept wing and (b) an oblique wing are compared. At all Mach numbers, the oblique wing (at its optimum sweep angle) had higher maximum lift-to-drag ratios than the fixed, swept wing. At high angles of attack, the direction of the pitching or rolling tendencies of the oblique wing was a function of the spanwise distribution of wing bend or washout for the two bends being investigated. At low angles of attack, linear theory gave satisfactory predictions of the subsonic lift-curve slope, the aerodynamic-center travel with Mach number, and the maximum lift-to-drag ratio.
Key concepts: Mach number, Swept wing, Physics, Aerospace engineering, Mechanics, Aerodynamics, Optics, Computer science