ScholarLens Back to search
2006•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Performance comparison of JPEG2000 and H.264/AVC high profile intra-frame coding on HD video sequences

Pankaj Topiwala, Trac Duy Tran, Wei Dai

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the rate-distortion performance comparison of JPEG2000 with H.264/AVC High Profile I-frame coding for high definition (HD) video sequences. This work is a follow-on to our paper at SPIE 05 [14], wherein we further optimize both codecs. This also extends a similar earlier study involving H.264/AVC Main Profile [2]. Coding simulations are performed on a set of 720p and 1080p HD video sequences, which have been commonly used for H.264/AVC standardization work. As expected, our experimental results show that H.264/AVC I-frame coding offers consistent R-D performance gains (around 0.2 to 1 dB in peak signal-to-noise ratio) over JPEG2000 color image coding. As in [1, 2], we do not consider scalability, complexity in this study (JPEG2000 is used in non-scalable, but optimal mode).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reconsiders the rate-distortion performance comparison of JPEG2000 with H.264/AVC High Profile I-frame coding for high definition (HD) video sequences. This work is a follow-on to our paper at SPIE 05 [14], wherein we further optimize both codecs. This also extends a similar earlier study involving H.264/AVC Main Profile [2]. Coding simulations are performed on a set of 720p and 1080p HD video sequences, which have been commonly used for H.264/AVC standardization work. As expected, our experimental results show that H.264/AVC I-frame coding offers consistent R-D performance gains (around 0.2 to 1 dB in peak signal-to-noise ratio) over JPEG2000 color image coding. As in [1, 2], we do not consider scalability, complexity in this study (JPEG2000 is used in non-scalable, but optimal mode).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reconsiders the rate-distortion performance comparison of JPEG2000 with H.264/AVC High Profile I-frame coding for high definition (HD) video sequences. This work is a follow-on to our paper at SPIE 05 [14], wherein we further optimize both codecs. This also extends a similar earlier study involving H.264/AVC Main Profile [2]. Coding simulations are performed on a set of 720p and 1080p HD video sequences, which have been commonly used for H.264/AVC standardization work. As expected, our experimental results show that H.264/AVC I-frame coding offers consistent R-D performance gains (around 0.2 to 1 dB in peak signal-to-noise ratio) over JPEG2000 color image coding. As in [1, 2], we do not consider scalability, complexity in this study (JPEG2000 is used in non-scalable, but optimal mode).

Key concepts: Scalable Video Coding, Context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding, Computer science, Context-adaptive variable-length coding, JPEG 2000, Coding (social sciences), Codec, Coding tree unit

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison of JPEG2000 and H.264/AVC high profile intra-frame coding on HD video sequences — Research Paper | ScholarLens