2003The Journal of Physical Chemistry ARequires access

Nonadiabatic Dynamics: A Comparison of Surface Hopping Direct Dynamics with Quantum Wavepacket Calculations

Graham A. Worth, Patricia A. Hunt, Michael A. Robb

Open publisher page 76 citations

Abstract

A semiclassical direct dynamics method for nonadiabatic systems is tested by comparing with quantum wave packet dynamics, looking at the molecular dynamics of the butatriene molecule after formation of the radical cation in the first excited, Ã, state. There is a conical intersection coupling this state to the cationic ground state, X̃, and this plays a major role in the system evolution. The direct dynamics study consists of 80 trajectories, with the potential energy surfaces calculated on-the-fly using a complete active space (CASSCF) electronic wave function. The quantum dynamics used a model Hamiltonian and the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method to solve the time evolution of the nuclear wave packet. The results show that the methods give a similar description of the initial part of the dynamics, with a similar time scale for the interstate crossing. A qualitatively different behavior is, however, seen after crossing to the lower adiabatic surface, with a recurrence in the quantum dynamics not present in the direct dynamics. The direct dynamics also indicates the possible importance of a second intersection seam, which is not present in the model used for the quantum dynamics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A semiclassical direct dynamics method for nonadiabatic systems is tested by comparing with quantum wave packet dynamics, looking at the molecular dynamics of the butatriene molecule after formation of the radical cation in the first excited, Ã, state. There is a conical intersection coupling this state to the cationic ground state, X̃, and this plays a major role in the system evolution. The direct dynamics study consists of 80 trajectories, with the potential energy surfaces calculated on-the-fly using a complete active space (CASSCF) electronic wave function. The quantum dynamics used a model Hamiltonian and the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method to solve the time evolution of the nuclear wave packet. The results show that the methods give a similar description of the initial part of the dynamics, with a similar time scale for the interstate crossing. A qualitatively different behavior is, however, seen after crossing to the lower adiabatic surface, with a recurrence in the quantum dynamics not present in the direct dynamics. The direct dynamics also indicates the possible importance of a second intersection seam, which is not present in the model used for the quantum dynamics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 76 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A semiclassical direct dynamics method for nonadiabatic systems is tested by comparing with quantum wave packet dynamics, looking at the molecular dynamics of the butatriene molecule after formation of the radical cation in the first excited, Ã, state. There is a conical intersection coupling this state to the cationic ground state, X̃, and this plays a major role in the system evolution. The direct dynamics study consists of 80 trajectories, with the potential energy surfaces calculated on-the-fly using a complete active space (CASSCF) electronic wave function. The quantum dynamics used a model Hamiltonian and the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method to solve the time evolution of the nuclear wave packet. The results show that the methods give a similar description of the initial part of the dynamics, with a similar time scale for the interstate crossing. A qualitatively different behavior is, however, seen after crossing to the lower adiabatic surface, with a recurrence in the quantum dynamics not present in the direct dynamics. The direct dynamics also indicates the possible importance of a second intersection seam, which is not present in the model used for the quantum dynamics.

Key concepts: Surface hopping, Conical intersection, Wave packet, Quantum dynamics, Semiclassical physics, Excited state, Quantum, Wave function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nonadiabatic Dynamics: A Comparison of Surface Hopping Direct Dynamics with Quantum Wavepacket Calculations — Research Paper | ScholarLens