1987•Critical Care MedicineRequires access

Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter- related infection in septic surgical patients

Judith A. Hudson-Civetta, Joseph M. Civetta, Octavio Martínez, Thomas A. Hoffman

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

Specimen cultures were evaluated in 49 catheterized patients who had a known focus of infection (primarily intra-abdominal peritonitis). Bacteria were recovered from 2% of flush solutions, 14% of transducer domes, 18% of diaphragms, and 24% of cardiac output fluids; however, these bacteria were not found in cultures of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter segments. The rates of positive PA catheter-aspirate cultures were 30.6% on day 1, 20.4% on day 2, and 32.7% on day 3 (not statistically different). PA catheter-aspirate cultures had a sensitivity of 5.7% and a positive predictive value of 30% for catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% positive predictive value for peripheral bacteremia. While 95% (55 of 58) of the catheter-aspirate cultures were false-positives, only 0.5% (3 of 588) were true-positives. Peripheral blood cultures were positive in 10% of the patients, but the catheter segments were sterile or grew different organisms. Arterial line cultures had zero sensitivity and predictive value to detect catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% predictive value to detect peripheral bacteremia. Thus, PA catheter-aspirate cultures, routine peripheral blood cultures, and arterial cultures cannot be recommended to detect PA catheter-related infection. Catheter-related infection confirmed by catheter-segment cultures was 10.2% when the PA catheters were removed after 73 +/- 6.5 (SD) h. Bacteria from catheter-segment cultures corresponded to those from the primary infection site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Specimen cultures were evaluated in 49 catheterized patients who had a known focus of infection (primarily intra-abdominal peritonitis). Bacteria were recovered from 2% of flush solutions, 14% of transducer domes, 18% of diaphragms, and 24% of cardiac output fluids; however, these bacteria were not found in cultures of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter segments. The rates of positive PA catheter-aspirate cultures were 30.6% on day 1, 20.4% on day 2, and 32.7% on day 3 (not statistically different). PA catheter-aspirate cultures had a sensitivity of 5.7% and a positive predictive value of 30% for catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% positive predictive value for peripheral bacteremia. While 95% (55 of 58) of the catheter-aspirate cultures were false-positives, only 0.5% (3 of 588) were true-positives. Peripheral blood cultures were positive in 10% of the patients, but the catheter segments were sterile or grew different organisms. Arterial line cultures had zero sensitivity and predictive value to detect catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% predictive value to detect peripheral bacteremia. Thus, PA catheter-aspirate cultures, routine peripheral blood cultures, and arterial cultures cannot be recommended to detect PA catheter-related infection. Catheter-related infection confirmed by catheter-segment cultures was 10.2% when the PA catheters were removed after 73 +/- 6.5 (SD) h. Bacteria from catheter-segment cultures corresponded to those from the primary infection site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Specimen cultures were evaluated in 49 catheterized patients who had a known focus of infection (primarily intra-abdominal peritonitis). Bacteria were recovered from 2% of flush solutions, 14% of transducer domes, 18% of diaphragms, and 24% of cardiac output fluids; however, these bacteria were not found in cultures of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter segments. The rates of positive PA catheter-aspirate cultures were 30.6% on day 1, 20.4% on day 2, and 32.7% on day 3 (not statistically different). PA catheter-aspirate cultures had a sensitivity of 5.7% and a positive predictive value of 30% for catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% positive predictive value for peripheral bacteremia. While 95% (55 of 58) of the catheter-aspirate cultures were false-positives, only 0.5% (3 of 588) were true-positives. Peripheral blood cultures were positive in 10% of the patients, but the catheter segments were sterile or grew different organisms. Arterial line cultures had zero sensitivity and predictive value to detect catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% predictive value to detect peripheral bacteremia. Thus, PA catheter-aspirate cultures, routine peripheral blood cultures, and arterial cultures cannot be recommended to detect PA catheter-related infection. Catheter-related infection confirmed by catheter-segment cultures was 10.2% when the PA catheters were removed after 73 +/- 6.5 (SD) h. Bacteria from catheter-segment cultures corresponded to those from the primary infection site.

Key concepts: Catheter, Medicine, Bacteremia, Pulmonary artery catheter, Sepsis, Blood culture, Arterial catheter, Pulmonary artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter- related infection in septic surgical patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens