1991Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryRequires access

The role of arthroscopic debridement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

W. Dilworth Cannon, Joyce M. Vittori

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

This retrospective study included 55 patients who had prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; 30 made up the experimental group who had arthroscopic debridement of impinging soft tissue and 25, who did not have a second-look arthroscopy, were used as controls. Impinging tissue was not necessarily the primary reason for arthroscopy in the experimental group. Only nine patients (30%) were debrided solely because of anterior symptoms suggestive of soft tissue impingement; 16 (53%) underwent arthroscopy primarily to assess meniscal repairs; five (17%) were done in conjunction with hardware removal. Both groups were evaluated for pain, crepitation, and anterior laxity at three specific times. Debridement reduced crepitation from 35% to 8% in patients with moderate crepitus, and from 50% to 38% in patients with mild symptoms. The percentage of patients without crepitation increased from 15% to 54% by final follow-up. Predebridement, 14% of patients had moderate pain, and 53% mild pain. By final follow-up, 38% had mild pain and 62% were pain free. Patients benefitted from debridement regardless of method of ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic debridement did not increase anterior knee translation. Both groups gained extension and had improved activity levels with the passage of time from ACL surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This retrospective study included 55 patients who had prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; 30 made up the experimental group who had arthroscopic debridement of impinging soft tissue and 25, who did not have a second-look arthroscopy, were used as controls. Impinging tissue was not necessarily the primary reason for arthroscopy in the experimental group. Only nine patients (30%) were debrided solely because of anterior symptoms suggestive of soft tissue impingement; 16 (53%) underwent arthroscopy primarily to assess meniscal repairs; five (17%) were done in conjunction with hardware removal. Both groups were evaluated for pain, crepitation, and anterior laxity at three specific times. Debridement reduced crepitation from 35% to 8% in patients with moderate crepitus, and from 50% to 38% in patients with mild symptoms. The percentage of patients without crepitation increased from 15% to 54% by final follow-up. Predebridement, 14% of patients had moderate pain, and 53% mild pain. By final follow-up, 38% had mild pain and 62% were pain free. Patients benefitted from debridement regardless of method of ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic debridement did not increase anterior knee translation. Both groups gained extension and had improved activity levels with the passage of time from ACL surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This retrospective study included 55 patients who had prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; 30 made up the experimental group who had arthroscopic debridement of impinging soft tissue and 25, who did not have a second-look arthroscopy, were used as controls. Impinging tissue was not necessarily the primary reason for arthroscopy in the experimental group. Only nine patients (30%) were debrided solely because of anterior symptoms suggestive of soft tissue impingement; 16 (53%) underwent arthroscopy primarily to assess meniscal repairs; five (17%) were done in conjunction with hardware removal. Both groups were evaluated for pain, crepitation, and anterior laxity at three specific times. Debridement reduced crepitation from 35% to 8% in patients with moderate crepitus, and from 50% to 38% in patients with mild symptoms. The percentage of patients without crepitation increased from 15% to 54% by final follow-up. Predebridement, 14% of patients had moderate pain, and 53% mild pain. By final follow-up, 38% had mild pain and 62% were pain free. Patients benefitted from debridement regardless of method of ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic debridement did not increase anterior knee translation. Both groups gained extension and had improved activity levels with the passage of time from ACL surgery.

Key concepts: Debridement (dental), Medicine, Arthroscopy, Surgery, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Anterior cruciate ligament, Soft tissue, Ligament

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of arthroscopic debridement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens