1998•The Journal of UrologyRequires access

DISCUSSION: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND SPECIFIC COMPLICATIONS OF GASTROCYSTOPLASTY FOR FAILED BLADDER EXSTROPHY CLOSURE

Alaa El‐Ghoneimi, CONRAD MULLER, Jean Michel Guys, MICHEL COQUET, Gerard J. Monfort

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The encouraging initial results of gastrocystoplasty led us to perform it for failed bladder exstrophy closure. We assess the functional outcome of the augmented bladder and evaluate complications related directly to use of the stomach in this specific group of children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed gastrocystoplasty in 22 children an average of 9.5 years old with a small, poorly compliant bladder after staged reconstruction of bladder exstrophy failed. Followup ranged from 6 months to 6 years (mean 3 years). RESULTS: Complete urinary continence was achieved in 14 children (64%). Voiding via the urethra was possible in 13 patients (60%) but post-voiding residual urine was significant in 12. Bladder capacity increased from a mean of 77 to 270 ml. Bladder capacity decreased during followup in 3 children, requiring repeat augmentation. Six children had isolated dysuria and 2 had dysuria with hematuria. Perforation of the gastric patch and a bleeding gastric ulcer occurred in 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: The disadvantages of gastrocystoplasty outnumber its advantages after failed bladder exstrophy closure. Urethral sensation makes dysuria a major discomfort. Safety is not optimal, since perforation may occur. Voiding is not efficient because gastrocystoplasty provides continence only when it is associated with intermittent catheterization. Bladder capacity is insufficiently augmented and inconsistent during followup. We believe that the use of gastrocystoplasty in cases of failed bladder exstrophy closure should be reconsidered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The encouraging initial results of gastrocystoplasty led us to perform it for failed bladder exstrophy closure. We assess the functional outcome of the augmented bladder and evaluate complications related directly to use of the stomach in this specific group of children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed gastrocystoplasty in 22 children an average of 9.5 years old with a small, poorly compliant bladder after staged reconstruction of bladder exstrophy failed. Followup ranged from 6 months to 6 years (mean 3 years). RESULTS: Complete urinary continence was achieved in 14 children (64%). Voiding via the urethra was possible in 13 patients (60%) but post-voiding residual urine was significant in 12. Bladder capacity increased from a mean of 77 to 270 ml. Bladder capacity decreased during followup in 3 children, requiring repeat augmentation. Six children had isolated dysuria and 2 had dysuria with hematuria. Perforation of the gastric patch and a bleeding gastric ulcer occurred in 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: The disadvantages of gastrocystoplasty outnumber its advantages after failed bladder exstrophy closure. Urethral sensation makes dysuria a major discomfort. Safety is not optimal, since perforation may occur. Voiding is not efficient because gastrocystoplasty provides continence only when it is associated with intermittent catheterization. Bladder capacity is insufficiently augmented and inconsistent during followup. We believe that the use of gastrocystoplasty in cases of failed bladder exstrophy closure should be reconsidered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The encouraging initial results of gastrocystoplasty led us to perform it for failed bladder exstrophy closure. We assess the functional outcome of the augmented bladder and evaluate complications related directly to use of the stomach in this specific group of children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed gastrocystoplasty in 22 children an average of 9.5 years old with a small, poorly compliant bladder after staged reconstruction of bladder exstrophy failed. Followup ranged from 6 months to 6 years (mean 3 years). RESULTS: Complete urinary continence was achieved in 14 children (64%). Voiding via the urethra was possible in 13 patients (60%) but post-voiding residual urine was significant in 12. Bladder capacity increased from a mean of 77 to 270 ml. Bladder capacity decreased during followup in 3 children, requiring repeat augmentation. Six children had isolated dysuria and 2 had dysuria with hematuria. Perforation of the gastric patch and a bleeding gastric ulcer occurred in 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: The disadvantages of gastrocystoplasty outnumber its advantages after failed bladder exstrophy closure. Urethral sensation makes dysuria a major discomfort. Safety is not optimal, since perforation may occur. Voiding is not efficient because gastrocystoplasty provides continence only when it is associated with intermittent catheterization. Bladder capacity is insufficiently augmented and inconsistent during followup. We believe that the use of gastrocystoplasty in cases of failed bladder exstrophy closure should be reconsidered.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bladder exstrophy, Dysuria, Bladder augmentation, Surgery, Clean Intermittent Catheterization, Cloacal exstrophy, Urethra

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DISCUSSION: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND SPECIFIC COMPLICATIONS OF GASTROCYSTOPLASTY FOR FAILED BLADDER EXSTROPHY CLOSURE — Research Paper | ScholarLens