COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY OF JACKKNIFE AND VARIANCE COMPONENT ESTIMATORS OF STANDARD ERRORS
Nicholas T. Longford
Abstract
Open-access reader
Nicholas T. Longford
Abstract
Open-access reader
ABSTRACT Large scale surveys usually employ a complex sampling design, and as a consequence no standard methods for estimation of the standard errors associated with the estimates of population means are available. Resampling methods, such as jackknife or bootstrap are often used, with reference to their properties of robustness and reduction of bias. We examine a method based on variance component models as an alternative to the jackknife procedure used for calculation of the standard errors for the subpopulation means of proficiency scores in a large scale survey of education in the U.S.A.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT Large scale surveys usually employ a complex sampling design, and as a consequence no standard methods for estimation of the standard errors associated with the estimates of population means are available. Resampling methods, such as jackknife or bootstrap are often used, with reference to their properties of robustness and reduction of bias. We examine a method based on variance component models as an alternative to the jackknife procedure used for calculation of the standard errors for the subpopulation means of proficiency scores in a large scale survey of education in the U.S.A.
Key concepts: Jackknife resampling, Resampling, Estimator, Standard error, Statistics, Variance (accounting), Robustness (evolution), Standard deviation