2008International Journal of Geotechnical EngineeringOpen access

Evolution of geotechnical soil testing I. Field tests

Richard L. Handy

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

AbstractThis paper takes a step back—some may say a step backward—to discuss how methods for measuring soil strength and compressibility have evolved through the decades. This is not a comprehensive review, but discusses paths that start in the past and point to the future. Part I discusses tests that are performed in situ in the field, and are mainly used for site investigations, with analyses that generally are based on empirical correlations. Part II describes the progression of laboratory tests that are slower, more precise, and more directed towards basic soil properties. A few select field tests incorporate features from both, being performed in situ while being targeted towards direct evaluations of basic soil properties. Three of the more important soil properties can only be determined in the field—depth, depth below a groundwater table, and lateral in-situ stress.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AbstractThis paper takes a step back—some may say a step backward—to discuss how methods for measuring soil strength and compressibility have evolved through the decades. This is not a comprehensive review, but discusses paths that start in the past and point to the future. Part I discusses tests that are performed in situ in the field, and are mainly used for site investigations, with analyses that generally are based on empirical correlations. Part II describes the progression of laboratory tests that are slower, more precise, and more directed towards basic soil properties. A few select field tests incorporate features from both, being performed in situ while being targeted towards direct evaluations of basic soil properties. Three of the more important soil properties can only be determined in the field—depth, depth below a groundwater table, and lateral in-situ stress.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AbstractThis paper takes a step back—some may say a step backward—to discuss how methods for measuring soil strength and compressibility have evolved through the decades. This is not a comprehensive review, but discusses paths that start in the past and point to the future. Part I discusses tests that are performed in situ in the field, and are mainly used for site investigations, with analyses that generally are based on empirical correlations. Part II describes the progression of laboratory tests that are slower, more precise, and more directed towards basic soil properties. A few select field tests incorporate features from both, being performed in situ while being targeted towards direct evaluations of basic soil properties. Three of the more important soil properties can only be determined in the field—depth, depth below a groundwater table, and lateral in-situ stress.

Key concepts: Geotechnical engineering, Geotechnical investigation, Geology, Field (mathematics), Pure mathematics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evolution of geotechnical soil testing I. Field tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens