1996Environmental Science & TechnologyRequires access

Monitoring Groundwater for Pesticides at Selected Mixing/Loading Sites in Arkansas

Scott Allen Senseman, Terry L. Lavy, Tommy C. Daniel

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

Groundwater monitoring studies have been conducted in recent years to survey contamination due to pesticides, yet few have addressed wells where pesticides are mixed, loaded, or rinsed. Beginning in 1990, a monitoring study conducted over a 2-year period included five collections at each of 16 mixer/loader locations to assess any pesticide and nitrate contamination. At sites in 11 counties, samples for pesticide analysis were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) disks. Samples were screened using gas chromatography-electron capture detection (ECD) and high-performance liquid chromatography−UV detection (LCUV) for 17 pesticides commonly used in Arkansas. Detections were confirmed by gas chromatography−mass spectroscopy (MS) or co-chromatography. Fourteen samples revealed atrazine (1 detection), cyanazine (4), parathion-methyl (2), metolachlor (2), norflurazon (1), pendimethalin (1), propanil (2), or trifluralin (1) at eight locations during the 2-year study. Two detections of parathion-methyl and one detection of trifluralin were above the Lifetime Health Advisory Level (LHAL) of 2 μg L - 1 . Data suggested a high correlation between pesticide used and pesticide detected at sites sampled. Three wells contained NO 3 -N concentrations of 10 mg L - 1 or higher, but these did not correlate with pesticide concentrations. The pesticide's proximity to the wells during mixing, rinsing, or loading was considered to be a greater influence on temporary contamination of groundwater than chemical or site-specific characteristics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Groundwater monitoring studies have been conducted in recent years to survey contamination due to pesticides, yet few have addressed wells where pesticides are mixed, loaded, or rinsed. Beginning in 1990, a monitoring study conducted over a 2-year period included five collections at each of 16 mixer/loader locations to assess any pesticide and nitrate contamination. At sites in 11 counties, samples for pesticide analysis were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) disks. Samples were screened using gas chromatography-electron capture detection (ECD) and high-performance liquid chromatography−UV detection (LCUV) for 17 pesticides commonly used in Arkansas. Detections were confirmed by gas chromatography−mass spectroscopy (MS) or co-chromatography. Fourteen samples revealed atrazine (1 detection), cyanazine (4), parathion-methyl (2), metolachlor (2), norflurazon (1), pendimethalin (1), propanil (2), or trifluralin (1) at eight locations during the 2-year study. Two detections of parathion-methyl and one detection of trifluralin were above the Lifetime Health Advisory Level (LHAL) of 2 μg L - 1 . Data suggested a high correlation between pesticide used and pesticide detected at sites sampled. Three wells contained NO 3 -N concentrations of 10 mg L - 1 or higher, but these did not correlate with pesticide concentrations. The pesticide's proximity to the wells during mixing, rinsing, or loading was considered to be a greater influence on temporary contamination of groundwater than chemical or site-specific characteristics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Groundwater monitoring studies have been conducted in recent years to survey contamination due to pesticides, yet few have addressed wells where pesticides are mixed, loaded, or rinsed. Beginning in 1990, a monitoring study conducted over a 2-year period included five collections at each of 16 mixer/loader locations to assess any pesticide and nitrate contamination. At sites in 11 counties, samples for pesticide analysis were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) disks. Samples were screened using gas chromatography-electron capture detection (ECD) and high-performance liquid chromatography−UV detection (LCUV) for 17 pesticides commonly used in Arkansas. Detections were confirmed by gas chromatography−mass spectroscopy (MS) or co-chromatography. Fourteen samples revealed atrazine (1 detection), cyanazine (4), parathion-methyl (2), metolachlor (2), norflurazon (1), pendimethalin (1), propanil (2), or trifluralin (1) at eight locations during the 2-year study. Two detections of parathion-methyl and one detection of trifluralin were above the Lifetime Health Advisory Level (LHAL) of 2 μg L - 1 . Data suggested a high correlation between pesticide used and pesticide detected at sites sampled. Three wells contained NO 3 -N concentrations of 10 mg L - 1 or higher, but these did not correlate with pesticide concentrations. The pesticide's proximity to the wells during mixing, rinsing, or loading was considered to be a greater influence on temporary contamination of groundwater than chemical or site-specific characteristics.

Key concepts: Pesticide, Atrazine, Trifluralin, Environmental chemistry, Propanil, Gas chromatography, Pendimethalin, Contamination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monitoring Groundwater for Pesticides at Selected Mixing/Loading Sites in Arkansas — Research Paper | ScholarLens