RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN PUBLIC POLICY: THE EFFECTS OF THE 65‐MPH SPEED LIMIT
Charles Lave, Patrick Elias
Abstract
Charles Lave, Patrick Elias
Abstract
In 1987 the U.S. government allowed states to raise speed limits to 65‐mph on some highways. We evaluate the consequences using a resource allocation perspective: the chance to drive faster reallocates traffic from side roads to the safer interstate highways, and a higher speed limit permits highway patrols to shift manpower from speed enforcement to other safety activities. This perspective implies that we should measure the effect of a speed limit by its systemwide rather than its local effects. We do so and find that the fatality rate dropped by 3.49%‐5.1% following the speed limit increase. (JEL A10, R40)
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In 1987 the U.S. government allowed states to raise speed limits to 65‐mph on some highways. We evaluate the consequences using a resource allocation perspective: the chance to drive faster reallocates traffic from side roads to the safer interstate highways, and a higher speed limit permits highway patrols to shift manpower from speed enforcement to other safety activities. This perspective implies that we should measure the effect of a speed limit by its systemwide rather than its local effects. We do so and find that the fatality rate dropped by 3.49%‐5.1% following the speed limit increase. (JEL A10, R40)
Key concepts: Speed limit, SAFER, Limit (mathematics), Resource allocation, Economics, Perspective (graphical), Government (linguistics), Enforcement