1989Archives of DermatologyRequires access

Chancroid

Allan Ronald

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

This is the centenary of Ducreyi's discovery of the bacillus, Haemophilus ducreyi . 1 During the initial two decades following his discovery, at least a score of microbiologists and clinicians studied both the organism and the disease, chancroid. However, for the following seven decades, there was a dearth of interest, with fewer than 30 significant publications. In most laboratories, the etiologic agent, H ducreyi , could not be reproducibly cultured from individuals with genital ulcers. Public health authorities were dubious that H ducreyi was responsible for chancroid, and it was suggested that chancroid was an atypical presentation of herpes simplex. The epidemiology was not understood. Sulfonamides were discovered to be effective for the treatment of chancroid, and a steady decline in the reported number of cases ensued. In 1977, only 455 cases were reported in the United States. During the 10th decade of the H ducreyi century, interest reawakened. Outbreaks of chancroid

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is the centenary of Ducreyi's discovery of the bacillus, Haemophilus ducreyi . 1 During the initial two decades following his discovery, at least a score of microbiologists and clinicians studied both the organism and the disease, chancroid. However, for the following seven decades, there was a dearth of interest, with fewer than 30 significant publications. In most laboratories, the etiologic agent, H ducreyi , could not be reproducibly cultured from individuals with genital ulcers. Public health authorities were dubious that H ducreyi was responsible for chancroid, and it was suggested that chancroid was an atypical presentation of herpes simplex. The epidemiology was not understood. Sulfonamides were discovered to be effective for the treatment of chancroid, and a steady decline in the reported number of cases ensued. In 1977, only 455 cases were reported in the United States. During the 10th decade of the H ducreyi century, interest reawakened. Outbreaks of chancroid

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is the centenary of Ducreyi's discovery of the bacillus, Haemophilus ducreyi . 1 During the initial two decades following his discovery, at least a score of microbiologists and clinicians studied both the organism and the disease, chancroid. However, for the following seven decades, there was a dearth of interest, with fewer than 30 significant publications. In most laboratories, the etiologic agent, H ducreyi , could not be reproducibly cultured from individuals with genital ulcers. Public health authorities were dubious that H ducreyi was responsible for chancroid, and it was suggested that chancroid was an atypical presentation of herpes simplex. The epidemiology was not understood. Sulfonamides were discovered to be effective for the treatment of chancroid, and a steady decline in the reported number of cases ensued. In 1977, only 455 cases were reported in the United States. During the 10th decade of the H ducreyi century, interest reawakened. Outbreaks of chancroid

Key concepts: Chancroid, Haemophilus ducreyi, Medicine, Genital ulcer, Outbreak, Sexually transmitted disease, Dermatology, Epidemiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chancroid — Research Paper | ScholarLens