1990Journal of Food ScienceRequires access

A Comparison of Mineral Extraction Techniques of Citrus Juices as Analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry

Ruhi Rezaaiyan, S. Nikdel

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two methods of mineral extraction for citrus juices were investigated: dry ashing in a muffle furnace and wet ashing in a microwave oven. Elemental concentrations were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP‐AES). For reference, a synthetic multielement mixture was prepared and analyzed. Results for the multielement solution using wet ashing in a microwave oven or dry ashing in a muffle furnace differed by less than 10% from those for an undigested, but diluted solution. An exception was boron, of which 96% was lost in the muffle furnace. Grapefruit juice analysis showed differences in concentration of less than 10% for all elements. Orange juice samples, however, showed greater losses for Na (16%), Si (13%), and Sn (11%) with the dry ashing method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Two methods of mineral extraction for citrus juices were investigated: dry ashing in a muffle furnace and wet ashing in a microwave oven. Elemental concentrations were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP‐AES). For reference, a synthetic multielement mixture was prepared and analyzed. Results for the multielement solution using wet ashing in a microwave oven or dry ashing in a muffle furnace differed by less than 10% from those for an undigested, but diluted solution. An exception was boron, of which 96% was lost in the muffle furnace. Grapefruit juice analysis showed differences in concentration of less than 10% for all elements. Orange juice samples, however, showed greater losses for Na (16%), Si (13%), and Sn (11%) with the dry ashing method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Two methods of mineral extraction for citrus juices were investigated: dry ashing in a muffle furnace and wet ashing in a microwave oven. Elemental concentrations were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP‐AES). For reference, a synthetic multielement mixture was prepared and analyzed. Results for the multielement solution using wet ashing in a microwave oven or dry ashing in a muffle furnace differed by less than 10% from those for an undigested, but diluted solution. An exception was boron, of which 96% was lost in the muffle furnace. Grapefruit juice analysis showed differences in concentration of less than 10% for all elements. Orange juice samples, however, showed greater losses for Na (16%), Si (13%), and Sn (11%) with the dry ashing method.

Key concepts: Ashing, Muffle furnace, Chemistry, Inductively coupled plasma, Microwave oven, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Mass spectrometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Mineral Extraction Techniques of Citrus Juices as Analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry — Research Paper | ScholarLens