1996Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic MediaRequires access

The first amendment as a sword: The positive liberty doctrine and cable must‐carry provisions

Matthew D. Bunker, Charles N. Davis

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Congress’ 1992 must‐carry provisions. The divided Court's opinion was inconclusive, but the reasoning of the justices highlights a broader theme. That theme, the notion of positive liberty, suggests that the proper role for government under the First Amendment is to become an active regulator in order to advance certain social interests. This study analyzes how the concept of positive liberty affected the differing constitutional visions expressed by the justices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Congress’ 1992 must‐carry provisions. The divided Court's opinion was inconclusive, but the reasoning of the justices highlights a broader theme. That theme, the notion of positive liberty, suggests that the proper role for government under the First Amendment is to become an active regulator in order to advance certain social interests. This study analyzes how the concept of positive liberty affected the differing constitutional visions expressed by the justices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Congress’ 1992 must‐carry provisions. The divided Court's opinion was inconclusive, but the reasoning of the justices highlights a broader theme. That theme, the notion of positive liberty, suggests that the proper role for government under the First Amendment is to become an active regulator in order to advance certain social interests. This study analyzes how the concept of positive liberty affected the differing constitutional visions expressed by the justices.

Key concepts: Constitutionality, Supreme court, Law, Doctrine, Vision, SWORD, Political science, Theme (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The first amendment as a sword: The positive liberty doctrine and cable must‐carry provisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens