Centrifuge Modeling of Geotextile-Reinforced Cohesive Soil Retaining Walls
Ali Porbaha, D. J. Goodings
Abstract
Ali Porbaha, D. J. Goodings
Abstract
Twenty-four reduced scale models of vertical and steeply sloping (1 H :6 V ) reinforced soil walls were built using kaolin as the backfill, reinforced with a nonwoven geotextile simulant, and loaded to failure under increasing self-weight in the geotechnical centrifuge. Models were constructed on either firm or rigid foundations, and different lengths of reinforcement were tested. No pullout failures were observed in any models. In vertical walls failure developed entirely within the reinforced zone when L /H≥ 0.75; in the steeply sloped walls this threshold occurred when L /H≥ 0.67. Models on firm foundations showed better performance than identical models built on rigid foundations. A stability analysis using the simplified, two-dimensional limit-equilibrium simplified Bishop method incorporating reinforcement was found to be a good predictor of the behavior of the models based on calculated factors of safety at failure. The development of tension cracks in the backfill as walls underwent prefailure deformations led to stress concentrations in the geosynthetics and should be avoided in practice.
OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Twenty-four reduced scale models of vertical and steeply sloping (1 H :6 V ) reinforced soil walls were built using kaolin as the backfill, reinforced with a nonwoven geotextile simulant, and loaded to failure under increasing self-weight in the geotechnical centrifuge. Models were constructed on either firm or rigid foundations, and different lengths of reinforcement were tested. No pullout failures were observed in any models. In vertical walls failure developed entirely within the reinforced zone when L /H≥ 0.75; in the steeply sloped walls this threshold occurred when L /H≥ 0.67. Models on firm foundations showed better performance than identical models built on rigid foundations. A stability analysis using the simplified, two-dimensional limit-equilibrium simplified Bishop method incorporating reinforcement was found to be a good predictor of the behavior of the models based on calculated factors of safety at failure. The development of tension cracks in the backfill as walls underwent prefailure deformations led to stress concentrations in the geosynthetics and should be avoided in practice.
Key concepts: Geotextile, Centrifuge, Geosynthetics, Geotechnical engineering, Mechanically stabilized earth, Reinforcement, Tension (geology), Geology