Who's Afraid of Canadian Legal History?
Philip Girard
Abstract
Philip Girard
Abstract
striking in its diversity in substance, theoretical context and methodology, . . . a far cry from the concerns of traditional English history focused primarily, as it was, on the evolution of the common law, the Royal courts, and the cast of characters who administered them and made decisions or practiced in them. . . . [T]he focus of contemporary legal historical scholarship in Canada . . . extend[s] well beyond the courts and their denizens to law and legal culture in all its complexity.3
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
striking in its diversity in substance, theoretical context and methodology, . . . a far cry from the concerns of traditional English history focused primarily, as it was, on the evolution of the common law, the Royal courts, and the cast of characters who administered them and made decisions or practiced in them. . . . [T]he focus of contemporary legal historical scholarship in Canada . . . extend[s] well beyond the courts and their denizens to law and legal culture in all its complexity.3
Key concepts: Legal history, Legal culture, Scholarship, Context (archaeology), Diversity (politics), Law, Legal realism, Focus (optics)