1984Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Atropine vs Glycopyrrolate During Reversal of Pancuronium Block in Patients Anaesthetized with Halothane

O. Takkunen, Markku Salmenperä, Jussi S. Heinonen

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 0.0075 mg kg-1 were compared as antimuscarinic agents during reversal of pancuronium block with neostigmine 0.03 mg kg-1 in 30 patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-halothane and undergoing minor surgery. In patients treated with atropine-neostigmine, the frequencies of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were relatively high and about the same as those reported by us previously in patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-fentanyl. As in our previous study, glycopyrrolate seemed to have advantages over atropine during reversal of pancuronium block: the incidences of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were significantly less in patients treated with glycopyrrolate. Recovery from anaesthesia, as assessed by the awakening after discontinuation of N2O and halothane administration, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, were not significantly different between the atropine and glycopyrrolate groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 0.0075 mg kg-1 were compared as antimuscarinic agents during reversal of pancuronium block with neostigmine 0.03 mg kg-1 in 30 patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-halothane and undergoing minor surgery. In patients treated with atropine-neostigmine, the frequencies of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were relatively high and about the same as those reported by us previously in patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-fentanyl. As in our previous study, glycopyrrolate seemed to have advantages over atropine during reversal of pancuronium block: the incidences of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were significantly less in patients treated with glycopyrrolate. Recovery from anaesthesia, as assessed by the awakening after discontinuation of N2O and halothane administration, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, were not significantly different between the atropine and glycopyrrolate groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 0.0075 mg kg-1 were compared as antimuscarinic agents during reversal of pancuronium block with neostigmine 0.03 mg kg-1 in 30 patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-halothane and undergoing minor surgery. In patients treated with atropine-neostigmine, the frequencies of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were relatively high and about the same as those reported by us previously in patients anaesthetized with thiopental-N2O-fentanyl. As in our previous study, glycopyrrolate seemed to have advantages over atropine during reversal of pancuronium block: the incidences of bradycardia and junctional rhythm were significantly less in patients treated with glycopyrrolate. Recovery from anaesthesia, as assessed by the awakening after discontinuation of N2O and halothane administration, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, were not significantly different between the atropine and glycopyrrolate groups.

Key concepts: Glycopyrrolate, Medicine, Atropine, Halothane, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Atropine vs Glycopyrrolate During Reversal of Pancuronium Block in Patients Anaesthetized with Halothane — Research Paper | ScholarLens