2000Bipolar DisordersOpen access

An open longitudinal study of patients with bipolar rapid cycling treated with lithium or lamotrigine for mood stabilization

Joerg Walden, Lars Schaerer, Sandra Schloesser, Heinz Grunze

Open full text 40 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder are frequently observed to fail conventional treatment. We conducted a preliminary study to explore the potential efficacy of lamotrigine in the treatment of this refractory patient population. METHODS: In an open longitudinal investigation, 14 patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder were treated for 1 year with either lithium or lamotrigine as mood stabilizer. RESULTS: Out of the seven patients with lithium, three out of seven (43%) had less than four and four out of seven (57%) had four or more episodes. In the lamotrigine group, six out of seven (86%) had less than four and one out of seven (14%) had more than four affective episodes (depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed). In fact, three out of seven (43%) of the patients who were on lamotrigine therapy were without any further affective episodes. There was no evidence of a preferential antidepressant versus antimanic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study is limited by the small number of patients, the results are in line with other investigations, suggesting efficacy for lamotrigine and a suboptimal response for lithium in rapid cycling bipolar disorder. These preliminary data need to be confirmed with controlled double blind studies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder are frequently observed to fail conventional treatment. We conducted a preliminary study to explore the potential efficacy of lamotrigine in the treatment of this refractory patient population. METHODS: In an open longitudinal investigation, 14 patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder were treated for 1 year with either lithium or lamotrigine as mood stabilizer. RESULTS: Out of the seven patients with lithium, three out of seven (43%) had less than four and four out of seven (57%) had four or more episodes. In the lamotrigine group, six out of seven (86%) had less than four and one out of seven (14%) had more than four affective episodes (depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed). In fact, three out of seven (43%) of the patients who were on lamotrigine therapy were without any further affective episodes. There was no evidence of a preferential antidepressant versus antimanic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study is limited by the small number of patients, the results are in line with other investigations, suggesting efficacy for lamotrigine and a suboptimal response for lithium in rapid cycling bipolar disorder. These preliminary data need to be confirmed with controlled double blind studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder are frequently observed to fail conventional treatment. We conducted a preliminary study to explore the potential efficacy of lamotrigine in the treatment of this refractory patient population. METHODS: In an open longitudinal investigation, 14 patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder were treated for 1 year with either lithium or lamotrigine as mood stabilizer. RESULTS: Out of the seven patients with lithium, three out of seven (43%) had less than four and four out of seven (57%) had four or more episodes. In the lamotrigine group, six out of seven (86%) had less than four and one out of seven (14%) had more than four affective episodes (depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed). In fact, three out of seven (43%) of the patients who were on lamotrigine therapy were without any further affective episodes. There was no evidence of a preferential antidepressant versus antimanic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study is limited by the small number of patients, the results are in line with other investigations, suggesting efficacy for lamotrigine and a suboptimal response for lithium in rapid cycling bipolar disorder. These preliminary data need to be confirmed with controlled double blind studies.

Key concepts: Lamotrigine, Rapid cycling, Lithium (medication), Bipolar disorder, Mood, Medicine, Mood stabilizer, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An open longitudinal study of patients with bipolar rapid cycling treated with lithium or lamotrigine for mood stabilization — Research Paper | ScholarLens