1976Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Comparison of the Effect of Anileridine and Pethidine on the Intracholedochal Pressure during Constant Fluid Perfusion

M. Tuominen

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Anileridine and pethidine have a spasmolytic action on animal intestine. Pethidine is known to have a spasmogenic effect at the choledocho-duodenal junction of man, but there is no study of the effect of anileridine on the biliary tract. In the present study the effects of anileridine and pethidine on the intracholedochal pressure during constant fluid perfusion in man were compared. The maximal elevation of the choledochal passage pressure was significantly greater after anileridine than after pethidine. However, the difference between anileridine and pethidine seemed to be less than that reported previously between morphine and pethidine. The effect of anileridine was of shorter duration than of pethidine. Anileridine and pethidine are not ideal analgesics when the normal activity of the biliary ductal system has to be maintained in pain or during cholangiography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Anileridine and pethidine have a spasmolytic action on animal intestine. Pethidine is known to have a spasmogenic effect at the choledocho-duodenal junction of man, but there is no study of the effect of anileridine on the biliary tract. In the present study the effects of anileridine and pethidine on the intracholedochal pressure during constant fluid perfusion in man were compared. The maximal elevation of the choledochal passage pressure was significantly greater after anileridine than after pethidine. However, the difference between anileridine and pethidine seemed to be less than that reported previously between morphine and pethidine. The effect of anileridine was of shorter duration than of pethidine. Anileridine and pethidine are not ideal analgesics when the normal activity of the biliary ductal system has to be maintained in pain or during cholangiography.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Anileridine and pethidine have a spasmolytic action on animal intestine. Pethidine is known to have a spasmogenic effect at the choledocho-duodenal junction of man, but there is no study of the effect of anileridine on the biliary tract. In the present study the effects of anileridine and pethidine on the intracholedochal pressure during constant fluid perfusion in man were compared. The maximal elevation of the choledochal passage pressure was significantly greater after anileridine than after pethidine. However, the difference between anileridine and pethidine seemed to be less than that reported previously between morphine and pethidine. The effect of anileridine was of shorter duration than of pethidine. Anileridine and pethidine are not ideal analgesics when the normal activity of the biliary ductal system has to be maintained in pain or during cholangiography.

Key concepts: Pethidine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Perfusion, Internal medicine, Analgesic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Effect of Anileridine and Pethidine on the Intracholedochal Pressure during Constant Fluid Perfusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens