1976PsychophysiologyRequires access

Effects of “Below‐Zero” Habituation on the Electrodermal Orienting Response to a Test Stimulus

David Stephenson, David A.T. Siddle

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two experiments were designed to investigate the effect of below‐zero habituation training on skin conductance response (SCR) amplitude to a change in auditory stimulus frequency. In both experiments, subjects were trained with a 1000 Hz tone until zero responding and then received 5, 10, or IS further training trials. In Experiment 1 (N=45), subjects then received 1 presentation of a test stimulus of 1400 Hz, while in Experiment 2 (N=45), the test stimulus was a tone of 670 Hz. On the basis of dual‐process theory, it was hypothesized that response amplitude to the test stimulus would be inversely related to amount of below‐zero training. However, the results of both experiments indicate that SCR amplitude was positively related to amount of below‐zero training. These results suggest that in situations of extended habituation training, an expectancy or subjective probability of stimulus occurrence gradient is important in determining response amplitude to a test stimulus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Two experiments were designed to investigate the effect of below‐zero habituation training on skin conductance response (SCR) amplitude to a change in auditory stimulus frequency. In both experiments, subjects were trained with a 1000 Hz tone until zero responding and then received 5, 10, or IS further training trials. In Experiment 1 (N=45), subjects then received 1 presentation of a test stimulus of 1400 Hz, while in Experiment 2 (N=45), the test stimulus was a tone of 670 Hz. On the basis of dual‐process theory, it was hypothesized that response amplitude to the test stimulus would be inversely related to amount of below‐zero training. However, the results of both experiments indicate that SCR amplitude was positively related to amount of below‐zero training. These results suggest that in situations of extended habituation training, an expectancy or subjective probability of stimulus occurrence gradient is important in determining response amplitude to a test stimulus.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Two experiments were designed to investigate the effect of below‐zero habituation training on skin conductance response (SCR) amplitude to a change in auditory stimulus frequency. In both experiments, subjects were trained with a 1000 Hz tone until zero responding and then received 5, 10, or IS further training trials. In Experiment 1 (N=45), subjects then received 1 presentation of a test stimulus of 1400 Hz, while in Experiment 2 (N=45), the test stimulus was a tone of 670 Hz. On the basis of dual‐process theory, it was hypothesized that response amplitude to the test stimulus would be inversely related to amount of below‐zero training. However, the results of both experiments indicate that SCR amplitude was positively related to amount of below‐zero training. These results suggest that in situations of extended habituation training, an expectancy or subjective probability of stimulus occurrence gradient is important in determining response amplitude to a test stimulus.

Key concepts: Habituation, Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Skin conductance, Audiology, Orienting response, Neutral stimulus, Amplitude

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of “Below‐Zero” Habituation on the Electrodermal Orienting Response to a Test Stimulus — Research Paper | ScholarLens