2004The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Sound quality in environment: ‘‘Psychoacoustic mapping.’’

Klaus Genuit

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The annoyance due to noise in the environment is often predicted by analysis software which calculates the A-weighted sound pressure level distribution depending on the sound sources and on the sound propagation caused by them. The actual subjective perceived noise annoyance of the environment does not only depend on the A-weighted sound pressure level, but also on the so-called sound quality along with other parameters like the aspects of a soundscape. The question regarding noise annoyance cannot be predicted by the A-weighted sound pressure level alone. The sound quality perceived by the human hearing depends on, among other things, loudness, roughness and sharpness. The previously known methods for the prediction of the spatial A-weighted sound pressure level distribution based on the propagation are not suitable to predict psycho-acoustic parameters in an adequate way. Especially the roughness caused by modulation or the sharpness generated by the contribution of high frequency sound energy at various distances cannot readily be predicted. In the following it will be shown what the requirements are and especially what the challenges are for making such a psychoacoustic mapping.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The annoyance due to noise in the environment is often predicted by analysis software which calculates the A-weighted sound pressure level distribution depending on the sound sources and on the sound propagation caused by them. The actual subjective perceived noise annoyance of the environment does not only depend on the A-weighted sound pressure level, but also on the so-called sound quality along with other parameters like the aspects of a soundscape. The question regarding noise annoyance cannot be predicted by the A-weighted sound pressure level alone. The sound quality perceived by the human hearing depends on, among other things, loudness, roughness and sharpness. The previously known methods for the prediction of the spatial A-weighted sound pressure level distribution based on the propagation are not suitable to predict psycho-acoustic parameters in an adequate way. Especially the roughness caused by modulation or the sharpness generated by the contribution of high frequency sound energy at various distances cannot readily be predicted. In the following it will be shown what the requirements are and especially what the challenges are for making such a psychoacoustic mapping.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The annoyance due to noise in the environment is often predicted by analysis software which calculates the A-weighted sound pressure level distribution depending on the sound sources and on the sound propagation caused by them. The actual subjective perceived noise annoyance of the environment does not only depend on the A-weighted sound pressure level, but also on the so-called sound quality along with other parameters like the aspects of a soundscape. The question regarding noise annoyance cannot be predicted by the A-weighted sound pressure level alone. The sound quality perceived by the human hearing depends on, among other things, loudness, roughness and sharpness. The previously known methods for the prediction of the spatial A-weighted sound pressure level distribution based on the propagation are not suitable to predict psycho-acoustic parameters in an adequate way. Especially the roughness caused by modulation or the sharpness generated by the contribution of high frequency sound energy at various distances cannot readily be predicted. In the following it will be shown what the requirements are and especially what the challenges are for making such a psychoacoustic mapping.

Key concepts: Loudness, Annoyance, Psychoacoustics, Acoustics, Sound pressure, Soundscape, Sound quality, Sound (geography)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sound quality in environment: ‘‘Psychoacoustic mapping.’’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens