1981ErgonomicsRequires access

Reading speed and text production A note on right-justification techniques

A. J. Campbell, F. M. Marchetti, D. J. K. Mewhort

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Three computer text-processing techniques were compared. The first was typescript without right justification. The other two involved right-justified text. The first (and the most common) right-justification technique involved calculating the space from the right margin to the end of a line of text in blank-character units and distributing the space in whole-character units between the words on that line. The second right-justification technique distributed the extra space at the end of a line proportionally both between and within the words forming the line. Each subject read the same passage prepared with one of the techniques and answered a short questionnaire concerning the material in the passage. Measurements of reading time showed that the variable-spacing right-justification technique improved reading speed in relation both to the text with an unjustified right margin and to the text with the right-justified margin produced by blank insertion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three computer text-processing techniques were compared. The first was typescript without right justification. The other two involved right-justified text. The first (and the most common) right-justification technique involved calculating the space from the right margin to the end of a line of text in blank-character units and distributing the space in whole-character units between the words on that line. The second right-justification technique distributed the extra space at the end of a line proportionally both between and within the words forming the line. Each subject read the same passage prepared with one of the techniques and answered a short questionnaire concerning the material in the passage. Measurements of reading time showed that the variable-spacing right-justification technique improved reading speed in relation both to the text with an unjustified right margin and to the text with the right-justified margin produced by blank insertion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three computer text-processing techniques were compared. The first was typescript without right justification. The other two involved right-justified text. The first (and the most common) right-justification technique involved calculating the space from the right margin to the end of a line of text in blank-character units and distributing the space in whole-character units between the words on that line. The second right-justification technique distributed the extra space at the end of a line proportionally both between and within the words forming the line. Each subject read the same passage prepared with one of the techniques and answered a short questionnaire concerning the material in the passage. Measurements of reading time showed that the variable-spacing right-justification technique improved reading speed in relation both to the text with an unjustified right margin and to the text with the right-justified margin produced by blank insertion.

Key concepts: Blank, Reading (process), Margin (machine learning), Character (mathematics), TypeScript, Line (geometry), Space (punctuation), Relation (database)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reading speed and text production A note on right-justification techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens