2000EcographyRequires access

Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting

Christopher M. Buddle, John R. Spence, David W. Langor

Open publisher page 180 citations

Abstract

To test whether spider succession following harvest differed from succession following wildfire, spiders were collected by pitfall trapping and sweep netting over two years in aspen‐dominated boreal forests. Over 8400 individuals from 127 species of spiders were identified from 12 stands representing three age‐classes (stand origin in 1995, 1982, and 1968) and two disturbance types (wildfire and harvesting). The diversity of spider assemblages tended to be higher in fire‐origin stands than in harvest‐origin stands; the youngest fire‐origin stands also supported more even distributions of spider species. Spider assemblages responded quickly to wildfire and harvesting as open habitat specialists colonized stands within one year after disturbance. Many web‐building species common to older forests either survived harvesting, or re‐colonized harvest‐origin stands more rapidly than they re‐colonized fire‐origin stands. Cluster analyses and DCA ordination show faunal convergence by ca 30 years after wildfire and harvesting; trajectories in re‐colonization, however, differed by disturbance type as the succession of spider assemblages from fire‐origin stands lagged behind spider succession in harvest‐origin stands. Comparison with cluster analyses using vegetation data and abiotic site conditions suggests spider assemblages recover from harvesting and fire more rapidly than do a variety of other site characteristics. Several spider species (e.g. Gnaphosa borea Kulezyński, Pirata bryantae Kurata, Arctosa alpigena (Doleschall)) appear dependent on some of the conditions associated with wildfires as they were absent or rarely collected in harvest‐origin stands.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To test whether spider succession following harvest differed from succession following wildfire, spiders were collected by pitfall trapping and sweep netting over two years in aspen‐dominated boreal forests. Over 8400 individuals from 127 species of spiders were identified from 12 stands representing three age‐classes (stand origin in 1995, 1982, and 1968) and two disturbance types (wildfire and harvesting). The diversity of spider assemblages tended to be higher in fire‐origin stands than in harvest‐origin stands; the youngest fire‐origin stands also supported more even distributions of spider species. Spider assemblages responded quickly to wildfire and harvesting as open habitat specialists colonized stands within one year after disturbance. Many web‐building species common to older forests either survived harvesting, or re‐colonized harvest‐origin stands more rapidly than they re‐colonized fire‐origin stands. Cluster analyses and DCA ordination show faunal convergence by ca 30 years after wildfire and harvesting; trajectories in re‐colonization, however, differed by disturbance type as the succession of spider assemblages from fire‐origin stands lagged behind spider succession in harvest‐origin stands. Comparison with cluster analyses using vegetation data and abiotic site conditions suggests spider assemblages recover from harvesting and fire more rapidly than do a variety of other site characteristics. Several spider species (e.g. Gnaphosa borea Kulezyński, Pirata bryantae Kurata, Arctosa alpigena (Doleschall)) appear dependent on some of the conditions associated with wildfires as they were absent or rarely collected in harvest‐origin stands.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 180 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To test whether spider succession following harvest differed from succession following wildfire, spiders were collected by pitfall trapping and sweep netting over two years in aspen‐dominated boreal forests. Over 8400 individuals from 127 species of spiders were identified from 12 stands representing three age‐classes (stand origin in 1995, 1982, and 1968) and two disturbance types (wildfire and harvesting). The diversity of spider assemblages tended to be higher in fire‐origin stands than in harvest‐origin stands; the youngest fire‐origin stands also supported more even distributions of spider species. Spider assemblages responded quickly to wildfire and harvesting as open habitat specialists colonized stands within one year after disturbance. Many web‐building species common to older forests either survived harvesting, or re‐colonized harvest‐origin stands more rapidly than they re‐colonized fire‐origin stands. Cluster analyses and DCA ordination show faunal convergence by ca 30 years after wildfire and harvesting; trajectories in re‐colonization, however, differed by disturbance type as the succession of spider assemblages from fire‐origin stands lagged behind spider succession in harvest‐origin stands. Comparison with cluster analyses using vegetation data and abiotic site conditions suggests spider assemblages recover from harvesting and fire more rapidly than do a variety of other site characteristics. Several spider species (e.g. Gnaphosa borea Kulezyński, Pirata bryantae Kurata, Arctosa alpigena (Doleschall)) appear dependent on some of the conditions associated with wildfires as they were absent or rarely collected in harvest‐origin stands.

Key concepts: Ecological succession, Spider, Ecology, Ordination, Disturbance (geology), Understory, Geography, Vegetation (pathology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting — Research Paper | ScholarLens