1994•International Journal of Artificial Intelligence ToolsRequires access

SPECIFIC CONSTRAINT HANDLING IN CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS

Bing Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abundant literatures exist on consistency techniques for solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). These literatures, however, focused mainly on finding efficient general techniques to achieve network consistency and to solve CSPs. So far, many techniques have been reported, e.g., node consistency, arc consistency, path consistency, k-consistency, forward checking, lookahead, partial lookahead, etc. Not enough attention has been given to individual constraints, and how constraint specific features may be exploited for more efficient consistency check. Many types of constraints exist in real problems, and each has its own features. These features may allow specific consistency techniques to be designed such that they are more efficient than the general algorithms. To analyze this issue, we divide a consistency algorithm into three parts: (1) activating constraints for check; (2) selecting the next constraint to be checked; and (3) checking the selected constraint. We will discuss how constraint specific features may influence each of these aspects and how special handling techniques may be designed to improve the efficiency. In order to allow these individual constraint handling techniques to be used, a new consistency algorithm is also proposed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abundant literatures exist on consistency techniques for solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). These literatures, however, focused mainly on finding efficient general techniques to achieve network consistency and to solve CSPs. So far, many techniques have been reported, e.g., node consistency, arc consistency, path consistency, k-consistency, forward checking, lookahead, partial lookahead, etc. Not enough attention has been given to individual constraints, and how constraint specific features may be exploited for more efficient consistency check. Many types of constraints exist in real problems, and each has its own features. These features may allow specific consistency techniques to be designed such that they are more efficient than the general algorithms. To analyze this issue, we divide a consistency algorithm into three parts: (1) activating constraints for check; (2) selecting the next constraint to be checked; and (3) checking the selected constraint. We will discuss how constraint specific features may influence each of these aspects and how special handling techniques may be designed to improve the efficiency. In order to allow these individual constraint handling techniques to be used, a new consistency algorithm is also proposed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abundant literatures exist on consistency techniques for solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). These literatures, however, focused mainly on finding efficient general techniques to achieve network consistency and to solve CSPs. So far, many techniques have been reported, e.g., node consistency, arc consistency, path consistency, k-consistency, forward checking, lookahead, partial lookahead, etc. Not enough attention has been given to individual constraints, and how constraint specific features may be exploited for more efficient consistency check. Many types of constraints exist in real problems, and each has its own features. These features may allow specific consistency techniques to be designed such that they are more efficient than the general algorithms. To analyze this issue, we divide a consistency algorithm into three parts: (1) activating constraints for check; (2) selecting the next constraint to be checked; and (3) checking the selected constraint. We will discuss how constraint specific features may influence each of these aspects and how special handling techniques may be designed to improve the efficiency. In order to allow these individual constraint handling techniques to be used, a new consistency algorithm is also proposed.

Key concepts: Local consistency, Consistency (knowledge bases), Constraint satisfaction problem, Computer science, Constraint (computer-aided design), Constraint satisfaction, Consistency model, Constraint logic programming

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SPECIFIC CONSTRAINT HANDLING IN CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens