2003Unpublished venueRequires access

DETECTION OF NOVEL SPLICE FORMS IN HUMAN AND MOUSE USING CROSS-SPECIES APPROACH

Zhengyan Kan, John C. Castle, Jason M. Johnson, N. F. Tsinoremas

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Millions of transcript sequences have become available for characterizing the transcriptome of human and mouse. Transcript databases have been extensively mined for extracting alternative splicing information within the same species; but they also represent a potentially valuable resource for the discovery of alternative splice variants in another species. In this study, we have performed analysis of alternative splicing patterns for 7,475 pairs of human and mouse genes. We found that cross-species transcript analysis could accomplish the same level of sensitivity in detecting constitutive splice patterns as EST resource from the same species. In contrast, identifying alternative splice patterns in human genes, mouse transcripts achieved only 50% of the sensitivity of human EST and 70% of the sensitivity of human mRNA. While identifying alternative splice patterns in mouse genes, human transcripts are 38% more sensitive than mouse mRNA, and reach 60% of the sensitivity of mouse EST. Furthermore, using the cross-species approach, we predicted novel alternative splice patterns for 42% of human genes and 51% of mouse genes. Splice site motif analysis suggests that the majority of predicted novel splice patterns are expressed in human. EST-based frequency analysis shows that novel splice patterns are expressed at lower frequency than alternative splice patterns present in the transcript data from both species, possibly explaining why they remain undetected in the transcript data of the same species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Millions of transcript sequences have become available for characterizing the transcriptome of human and mouse. Transcript databases have been extensively mined for extracting alternative splicing information within the same species; but they also represent a potentially valuable resource for the discovery of alternative splice variants in another species. In this study, we have performed analysis of alternative splicing patterns for 7,475 pairs of human and mouse genes. We found that cross-species transcript analysis could accomplish the same level of sensitivity in detecting constitutive splice patterns as EST resource from the same species. In contrast, identifying alternative splice patterns in human genes, mouse transcripts achieved only 50% of the sensitivity of human EST and 70% of the sensitivity of human mRNA. While identifying alternative splice patterns in mouse genes, human transcripts are 38% more sensitive than mouse mRNA, and reach 60% of the sensitivity of mouse EST. Furthermore, using the cross-species approach, we predicted novel alternative splice patterns for 42% of human genes and 51% of mouse genes. Splice site motif analysis suggests that the majority of predicted novel splice patterns are expressed in human. EST-based frequency analysis shows that novel splice patterns are expressed at lower frequency than alternative splice patterns present in the transcript data from both species, possibly explaining why they remain undetected in the transcript data of the same species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Millions of transcript sequences have become available for characterizing the transcriptome of human and mouse. Transcript databases have been extensively mined for extracting alternative splicing information within the same species; but they also represent a potentially valuable resource for the discovery of alternative splice variants in another species. In this study, we have performed analysis of alternative splicing patterns for 7,475 pairs of human and mouse genes. We found that cross-species transcript analysis could accomplish the same level of sensitivity in detecting constitutive splice patterns as EST resource from the same species. In contrast, identifying alternative splice patterns in human genes, mouse transcripts achieved only 50% of the sensitivity of human EST and 70% of the sensitivity of human mRNA. While identifying alternative splice patterns in mouse genes, human transcripts are 38% more sensitive than mouse mRNA, and reach 60% of the sensitivity of mouse EST. Furthermore, using the cross-species approach, we predicted novel alternative splice patterns for 42% of human genes and 51% of mouse genes. Splice site motif analysis suggests that the majority of predicted novel splice patterns are expressed in human. EST-based frequency analysis shows that novel splice patterns are expressed at lower frequency than alternative splice patterns present in the transcript data from both species, possibly explaining why they remain undetected in the transcript data of the same species.

Key concepts: splice, Computer science, Computational biology, Biology, Genetics, Gene

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DETECTION OF NOVEL SPLICE FORMS IN HUMAN AND MOUSE USING CROSS-SPECIES APPROACH — Research Paper | ScholarLens