1986SPE California Regional MeetingRequires access

Relative Permeability from Centrifuge Data

Abbas Firoozabadi, Khalid Aziz

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The drainage of a wetting phase (say oil) by a non-wetting phase (say gas) may be simulated in the centrifuge by two liquids. Such experiments were conducted on a number of cores and they are discussed in a companion paper. In this paper we consider two of the cores with available capillary pressure data. Two forms of the relative permeability models are selected and the parameters of these models are obtained by history matching with a numerical simulator developed for this study that properly accounts for the capillary pressure and the boundary conditions in centrifuge experiments. It is shown that; (1) recoveries can be matched with two – and maybe even more – very different sets of relative permeability curves; (2) recoveries are sensitive to the parameters of each relative permeability model; (3) excellent history match is possible with arbitrarily small capillary pressure values, but the resulting relative permeabilities are different from those obtained with experimental values of the capillary pressure; and (4) late time predictions can be improved by using a linear relationship for the wetting phase relative permeability below some arbitrary value of the wetting phase saturation. It is concluded that the capillary pressure (Pc) term should not be ignored in obtaining relative permeability curves from centrifuge data. Analytical or numerical models that do not properly include Pc or ignore Pc should be used with caution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The drainage of a wetting phase (say oil) by a non-wetting phase (say gas) may be simulated in the centrifuge by two liquids. Such experiments were conducted on a number of cores and they are discussed in a companion paper. In this paper we consider two of the cores with available capillary pressure data. Two forms of the relative permeability models are selected and the parameters of these models are obtained by history matching with a numerical simulator developed for this study that properly accounts for the capillary pressure and the boundary conditions in centrifuge experiments. It is shown that; (1) recoveries can be matched with two – and maybe even more – very different sets of relative permeability curves; (2) recoveries are sensitive to the parameters of each relative permeability model; (3) excellent history match is possible with arbitrarily small capillary pressure values, but the resulting relative permeabilities are different from those obtained with experimental values of the capillary pressure; and (4) late time predictions can be improved by using a linear relationship for the wetting phase relative permeability below some arbitrary value of the wetting phase saturation. It is concluded that the capillary pressure (Pc) term should not be ignored in obtaining relative permeability curves from centrifuge data. Analytical or numerical models that do not properly include Pc or ignore Pc should be used with caution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The drainage of a wetting phase (say oil) by a non-wetting phase (say gas) may be simulated in the centrifuge by two liquids. Such experiments were conducted on a number of cores and they are discussed in a companion paper. In this paper we consider two of the cores with available capillary pressure data. Two forms of the relative permeability models are selected and the parameters of these models are obtained by history matching with a numerical simulator developed for this study that properly accounts for the capillary pressure and the boundary conditions in centrifuge experiments. It is shown that; (1) recoveries can be matched with two – and maybe even more – very different sets of relative permeability curves; (2) recoveries are sensitive to the parameters of each relative permeability model; (3) excellent history match is possible with arbitrarily small capillary pressure values, but the resulting relative permeabilities are different from those obtained with experimental values of the capillary pressure; and (4) late time predictions can be improved by using a linear relationship for the wetting phase relative permeability below some arbitrary value of the wetting phase saturation. It is concluded that the capillary pressure (Pc) term should not be ignored in obtaining relative permeability curves from centrifuge data. Analytical or numerical models that do not properly include Pc or ignore Pc should be used with caution.

Key concepts: Relative permeability, Capillary pressure, Centrifuge, Wetting, Capillary action, Saturation (graph theory), Permeability (electromagnetism), Mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative Permeability from Centrifuge Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens