2009•Acta Neurologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Comparison between directional Doppler and angiography in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery disease

Sven‐Erik Eriksson, Vera Zbornikova, Ingegerd Johansson, Hans Link

Open publisher page 143 citations

Abstract

Directional Doppler examination (DD) with flow registration over the supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries and over the carotid artery in the neck was adopted to 99 carotid arteries in 56 patients without previous knowledge of angiography results, and thereafter DD and angiography findings were compared. On subgrouping of the angiography results into internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis less than 50%, greater than 50%, and occlusion, a correct diagnosis was obtained by DD on 90 vessels (91%). All 11 ICA occlusions were correctly diagnosed by DD. The incorrect results obtained with DD were as follows: Four ICA stenosis less than 50% were classified as stenosis greater than 50%; four stenosis greater than 50% were classified as less than 50%; one stenosis greater than 50% was classified as occlusion. DD is a useful noninvasive screening method for the detection of occlusion and greater than 50% stenosis of ICA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Directional Doppler examination (DD) with flow registration over the supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries and over the carotid artery in the neck was adopted to 99 carotid arteries in 56 patients without previous knowledge of angiography results, and thereafter DD and angiography findings were compared. On subgrouping of the angiography results into internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis less than 50%, greater than 50%, and occlusion, a correct diagnosis was obtained by DD on 90 vessels (91%). All 11 ICA occlusions were correctly diagnosed by DD. The incorrect results obtained with DD were as follows: Four ICA stenosis less than 50% were classified as stenosis greater than 50%; four stenosis greater than 50% were classified as less than 50%; one stenosis greater than 50% was classified as occlusion. DD is a useful noninvasive screening method for the detection of occlusion and greater than 50% stenosis of ICA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 143 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Directional Doppler examination (DD) with flow registration over the supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries and over the carotid artery in the neck was adopted to 99 carotid arteries in 56 patients without previous knowledge of angiography results, and thereafter DD and angiography findings were compared. On subgrouping of the angiography results into internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis less than 50%, greater than 50%, and occlusion, a correct diagnosis was obtained by DD on 90 vessels (91%). All 11 ICA occlusions were correctly diagnosed by DD. The incorrect results obtained with DD were as follows: Four ICA stenosis less than 50% were classified as stenosis greater than 50%; four stenosis greater than 50% were classified as less than 50%; one stenosis greater than 50% was classified as occlusion. DD is a useful noninvasive screening method for the detection of occlusion and greater than 50% stenosis of ICA.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stenosis, Occlusion, Internal carotid artery, Angiography, Radiology, Carotid arteries, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between directional Doppler and angiography in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens