Pediatric patient classification system: improvement of an instrument
Ariane Polidoro Dini, Edinêis de Brito Guirardello
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ariane Polidoro Dini, Edinêis de Brito Guirardello
Abstract
Open-access reader
OBJECTIVE: Improve the content validity of the instrument for classification of pediatric patients and evaluate its construct validity. METHOD: A descriptive exploratory study in the measurement of the content validity index, and correlational design for construct validation through exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The content validity index for indicators was 0.99 and it was 0.97 for graded situations. Three domains were extracted in the construct validation, namely: patient, family and therapeutic procedures, with 74.97% of explained variance. The instrument showed evidences of content and construct validity. CONCLUSION: The validation of the instrument occurred under the approach of family-centered care, and allowed incorporating some essential needs of childhood such as playing, interaction and affection in the content of the instrument.
OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: Improve the content validity of the instrument for classification of pediatric patients and evaluate its construct validity. METHOD: A descriptive exploratory study in the measurement of the content validity index, and correlational design for construct validation through exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The content validity index for indicators was 0.99 and it was 0.97 for graded situations. Three domains were extracted in the construct validation, namely: patient, family and therapeutic procedures, with 74.97% of explained variance. The instrument showed evidences of content and construct validity. CONCLUSION: The validation of the instrument occurred under the approach of family-centered care, and allowed incorporating some essential needs of childhood such as playing, interaction and affection in the content of the instrument.
Key concepts: Content validity, Construct validity, Construct (python library), Variance (accounting), Affection, Psychology, Exploratory factor analysis, Index (typography)