1989Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes

David M. Kreps, José Scheinkman

Open publisher page 1,664 citations

Abstract

Bertrand's model of oligopoly, which gives perfectly competitive outcomes, assumes that: (1) there is competition over prices and (2) production follows the realization of demand. We show that both of these assumptions are required. More precisely, consider a two-stage oligopoly game where, first, there is simultaneous production, and, second, after production levels are made public, there is price competition. Under mild assumptions about demand, the unique equilibrium outcome is the Cournot outcome. This illustrates that solutions to oligopoly games depend on both the strategic variables employed and the context (game form) in which those variables are employed. Introduction Since Bertrand's (1883) criticism of Cournot's (1838) work, economists have come to realize that solutions to oligopoly games depend critically on the strategic variables that firms are assumed to use. Consider, for example, the simple case of a duopoly where each firm produces at a constant cost b per unit and where the demand curve is linear, p = a – q . Cournot (quantity) competition yields equilibrium price p = ( a + 2 b )/3, while Bertrand (price) competition yields p = b . In this article, we show by example that there is more to Bertrand competition than simply “competition over prices.” It is easiest to explain what we mean by reviewing the stories associated with Cournot and Bertrand.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bertrand's model of oligopoly, which gives perfectly competitive outcomes, assumes that: (1) there is competition over prices and (2) production follows the realization of demand. We show that both of these assumptions are required. More precisely, consider a two-stage oligopoly game where, first, there is simultaneous production, and, second, after production levels are made public, there is price competition. Under mild assumptions about demand, the unique equilibrium outcome is the Cournot outcome. This illustrates that solutions to oligopoly games depend on both the strategic variables employed and the context (game form) in which those variables are employed. Introduction Since Bertrand's (1883) criticism of Cournot's (1838) work, economists have come to realize that solutions to oligopoly games depend critically on the strategic variables that firms are assumed to use. Consider, for example, the simple case of a duopoly where each firm produces at a constant cost b per unit and where the demand curve is linear, p = a – q . Cournot (quantity) competition yields equilibrium price p = ( a + 2 b )/3, while Bertrand (price) competition yields p = b . In this article, we show by example that there is more to Bertrand competition than simply “competition over prices.” It is easiest to explain what we mean by reviewing the stories associated with Cournot and Bertrand.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1664 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bertrand's model of oligopoly, which gives perfectly competitive outcomes, assumes that: (1) there is competition over prices and (2) production follows the realization of demand. We show that both of these assumptions are required. More precisely, consider a two-stage oligopoly game where, first, there is simultaneous production, and, second, after production levels are made public, there is price competition. Under mild assumptions about demand, the unique equilibrium outcome is the Cournot outcome. This illustrates that solutions to oligopoly games depend on both the strategic variables employed and the context (game form) in which those variables are employed. Introduction Since Bertrand's (1883) criticism of Cournot's (1838) work, economists have come to realize that solutions to oligopoly games depend critically on the strategic variables that firms are assumed to use. Consider, for example, the simple case of a duopoly where each firm produces at a constant cost b per unit and where the demand curve is linear, p = a – q . Cournot (quantity) competition yields equilibrium price p = ( a + 2 b )/3, while Bertrand (price) competition yields p = b . In this article, we show by example that there is more to Bertrand competition than simply “competition over prices.” It is easiest to explain what we mean by reviewing the stories associated with Cournot and Bertrand.

Key concepts: Precommitment, Cournot competition, Economics, Bertrand competition, Bertrand paradox (economics), Yield (engineering), Microeconomics, Competition (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes — Research Paper | ScholarLens